Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. l:. <br /> <br />1868 <br /> <br />A reconstruction of the Trinidad Reservoir operation with the transfer of <br />water out of the Model right eliminate? an? with winter s~orage recorded <br />under the Mode 1 ri ght was performed to 1 dent lfy the changes 1 n water stored <br />that have occurred as a result of these practices. This reconstruction <br />showed the following changes in the amounts of water placed in storage: <br /> <br />1."1': <br /> <br />Year <br /> <br />Annual Change in Water Storage in Trinidad Reservoir <br />Actual Operation Minus Reconstructed Operation <br /> <br />1979 <br />1980 <br />1981 <br />1982 <br />1983 <br />1984 <br />TOTAL <br />ANNUAL AVERAGE <br /> <br />1,054 A.F. <br />30,068 A.F. <br />- 8,634 A.F. <br />8,709 A.F. <br />6,274 A.F. <br />-13,616 A.F. <br />23,855 A.F. <br />3,976 A.F. <br /> <br />A month ly surrunary and exp 1 anat i on of the computat ion procedure are contai ned <br />in Appendi x 11. <br /> <br />The above fi 9ures reasonab ly represent the increase in water supp ly to the <br />District accomplished through these water rights administration practi~es. <br />Further analysis is required to determine the impact that these practices <br />had on the inflow to John Martin Reservoir. <br /> <br />Following discussion with the States of Kansas and Colorado and the <br />Purgatoire Water Conservancy District, the methodology employed in the 1961 <br />and 1964 operation studies was used to determine the impacts on the inflow <br />to John Martin Reservoir. A computer model was first developed to <br />reconstruct the 1961 study. The results of the computer model were com- <br />pared to the original 1961 study to verify the validity of the model. The <br />results compared favorably and the model was judged to be satisfactory (see <br />Appendix Ill). <br /> <br />The computer model and input data were then modified to fit the parameters of <br />the 1964 study. The original 1964 study modified the 1961 study by changing <br />distribution of the water within the District and determining the bypasses on a <br />daily basis rather then a monthly basis. While the original 1964 study deve- <br />loped most of the information presented in the 1961 study, it did not determine <br />the effects on the inflow to John Martin Reservoir. However, the computer model <br />does calculate the impacts to the inflow to John Martin Reservoir using the cri- <br />teria contained in the 1961 study. This computer-based reconstruction of the <br />1964 study is hereafter referred to as the base 1 i ne study. More detai 1 ed i n- <br />formation on the computer program and calibration is contained in Appendix III. <br /> <br />The impact on the inflow to John Martin Reservoir during the 1979-84 review' <br />peri od as a resu 1 t of the transfers out of the Mode 1 ri ght and the wi nter <br />storage under the direct flow rights was computed for three different sets of <br />assumptions, hereafter referred to as Case 1, Case 2 and Case 3. Under both <br />Case 1 and Case 2, the computation shows the difference in the actual inflow as <br />compared to what would have occurred had the full 19,717 acres under the project <br /> <br />.~ . <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />:1 <br />,:.:/:~~.:;;. ~ <br /> <br />."". <br />'".:<; <br /> <br />.<'~ II <br />,.,"",",.,,',., I <br />"',C{' <br /> <br />I <br />