Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I' <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /><C) <br />(0') <br />N <br />~ <br />0') <br />~j <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />AUG 1 1 1997 <br /> <br />HELTON & WILLIAMSEN, P.C. <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS IN WATER RESOURCES <br />384 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 115 <br />ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112 <br />PHONE (303) 792-2161 <br />FAX (303) 792-2165 <br /> <br />DIV:St(;i~ ~: ;,_::;\:i.:r.:.H <br />~L~j~.(:,. (,JLO!Yl.DO <br /> <br />August 8, 1997 <br /> <br />Mr. Steven J. Witte <br />Colorado Division of Water Resources <br />310 E. Abriendo. Suite B <br />Pueblo, Colorado 81004 <br /> <br />Subject: Supplemental Information for Replacement Plan Amendment _ <br />Lower Arkansas Water Management Association <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Witte: <br /> <br />This letter supplements the information concerning the historical use of LAWMA's <br />interests in the Highland Irrigation Company. Our earlier correspondence. dated July 10.1997. <br />requested that the Highland Canal water be included as a replacement source for LAWMA's <br />1997 plan. We submitted an amendment to the replacement plan on August 1 in which we <br />agreed to present an analysis of the historical use of the Highland Canal consistent with the <br />algorithm and parameters used in Kansas' H-I model. This letter presents the results of that <br />analysis. <br /> <br />I conferred with Dewayne Schroeder about the data and procedures used in the H-I <br />model. The Highland Canal was not included in Kansas' analyses of Colorado irrigation <br />ditches. so the parameters used in this analysis are based on information for similar ditches <br />included in the H-I model. In general, the H-I model performs a water budget analysis in which <br />irrigation deliveries are inflow to the root zone and crop consumptive use, tail water and deep <br />percolation are outflow. The soil acts as a reservoir, and when the root zone is full. excess <br />applications are assigned to deep percolation. The model also accounts for canal and lateral <br />seepage. The canal seepage rate is based on the canal length. For the Highland Canal. the <br />seepage rate is calculated to be about 10 percent of the diversion. The lateral seepage has off- <br />farm and on-farm components. The lateral seepage rate used for all Colorado ditches was 7 <br />percent. One-half of this rate. or 3.5 percent. is applied to the canal diversion volume and one- <br />half, 3.5 percent. is applied to the farm delivery. Tail water for all ditches is calculated as 10 <br />percent of the farm delivery less on-farm lateral losses. In the recent H-I model version. the <br />maximum irrigation efficiency for Colorado ditches was limited to 65 percent except for the <br />Lamar/Manvel and Colorado Canals which were set at 70 percent. The irrigation efficiency <br />includes on-farm lateral seepage, tail water and deep percolation losses. Using a maximum <br />efficiency of 65 percent, the minimum deep perCOlation rate works out to be about 22.6 percent <br />of the farm delivery less on-farm lateral losses. <br /> <br />The H-I model also calculates "secondary evaporation" (SEV) on the canal seepage. off- <br />farm and on-farm lateral seepage and tail water. Following are the monthly SEV rates: <br />