Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..... <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />01370 , <br /> <br />Apportionment <br /> <br />The apportionment obligation is an important element of the CRSP <br />power rate. Apportionment means that if one of the four states <br />involved (Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming) has a <br />requirement for irrigation assistance, all states must be <br />apportioned or allotted a certain amount of funds (Chart III). For <br />example since Utah's apportionment percentage is 21.5 percent, when <br />it requires assistance, $4.65 must be made available to all states <br />for each $1.00 that Utah requires. Several projects in all four <br />states are involved with apportionment as can be seen in this <br />rather "busy. chart (Chart IV). However because of the amount and <br />timing of its requirements, the state of Utah triggers <br />apportionment in every year of the study except for one year when <br />\:l,1V\ ~. .",ln9' s San Juan Chama block I drives the apportionment. This is <br />because the apportionment that is triggered by Utah's needs more <br />than covers the other states' needs when they occur. Chart IV <br />shows that in the current power repayment study, about $1.3 billion <br />is required for irrigation assistance but about that much more or <br />another $1.3 billion is required for apportionment to states <br />according to the CRSP Act of 1956. <br /> <br />Effects of Apportionment <br /> <br />The power repayment study is like a snapshot in time. In order to <br />calculate a rate, projections must be made about future conditions <br />with the CRSP. Estimates of generation must be made. Estimates of <br />revenue requirements must also be made. Both estimates impact the <br />rate because revenue requirements must be divided by generation in <br />order to arrive at a rate per unit of power sold. Assumptions <br />about the amount and timing of repayment obligations can effect the <br />rate. For example, if the study is run without the apportionment <br />obligation, the rate decreases by about 1.11 mills per kWh. This <br />composite rate is determined by taking the associated revenue <br />requirements and dividing by the corresponding sales of energy <br />(kWh) during the rate setting period. When an adjustment like the <br />deletion of apportionment occurs, other revenue requirements such <br />as interest shift somewhat as can be seen in Chart V and VI. The <br />repayment of plant also shifts because even though the overall rate <br />is less, near term capital repayment requirements remain unchanged. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />SUllllllary <br /> <br />In summary, this discussion gives a general overview of how CRSP <br />rates are set during the ratesetting period, what costs are <br />involved, and how the pinchpoint determines the rate. We also <br />talked about one of the elements of the rate or apportionment and <br />how this effects the rate. <br /> <br />..- -- ,.... -.~.,..-:---.- ---~- ."-- - _.' <br /> <br />. -,- --__._r.___,_:-- ..';"-;-._...........,._.. ..._ ,. <br />