Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />iJJ2l:J8 <br /> <br />4.0 DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Erosion is, in most cases, a natural activity occurring on reservoir shorelines. However, <br />due to numerous possible factors, the intensity of this normal erosion activity can be <br />increased. This increase can lead to resource risks, including decreased stabilization of <br />shoreline banks near campgrounds and roads. In these cases, erosion sites may need to <br />be actively managed. The twenty-two erosion sites identified in this survey are located <br />on all shores of the Williams Fork Reservoir, and are predominantly caused by normal <br />wave activity. Only erosion sites ER02-l718, ER02-1721, and ER02-1722 present a <br />significant resource risk, The other nineteen erosion sites present no resource risk or only <br />minor resource risks in the form of aesthetics and/or loss of upland areas, <br /> <br />Erosion site ER02-17l8 is located adjacent to the southern campground at the confluence <br />of the Williams Fork River with the Williams Fork Reservoir. At this location, the river <br />is cutting into the bank and erosion is encroaching on campsites. At the time of this <br />erosion survey, two campsites were observed to have been partially lost to erosion of the <br />river bank, The cause of increased intensity in this erosion site is not fully known. <br />However, it appears that construction of the new bridge approximately 200 yards <br />upstream of erosion site ER02-1718 has altered water flow patterns of the river, leading <br />to increased erosion in specific areas. As water passes through the concrete footings of <br />the bridge, its velocity is increased as it is funneled in a straight line, The straight line <br />created by the bridge forces the water towards the bank of the river supporting the <br />campground. As a result of the water being forced directly into the stream bank at an <br />accelerated velocity, the intensity of erosion activity in this area has been increased. The <br />potential for significant erosion to continue at this site is high, especially during peak <br />flow events in the Williams Fork River. <br /> <br />Erosion sites ER02-1721 and ER02-1722 are located in line with one another (from <br />north to south respectively) on the eastern shore of the reservoir. Erosion at these sites <br />has created high bluffs along the shoreline, and is continuing to encroach on upland areas <br />located adjacent to private lands just east of the reservoir and FERC boundary line. The <br />high bluffs at these two erosion sites continue to be eroded by bank cut processes. Waves <br />generated within the reservoir erode the lower soil levels first, undercutting the bank. As <br />sediment is removed at the base of the bluffs, the layers of soil above lose support and <br />fall to the beach where they are eroded away, This active process continues to result in <br />the loss of upland areas on this portion of the Williams Fork Project. <br /> <br />This reservoir bank was split into two separate erosion sites, as opposed to one long <br />continuous site, because characteristics of the two sites are different. Remediation <br />activities have already begun on the northernmost site (ER02- \ 721), The reservoir bank <br />at this site has been graded back to create a more gradual slope, and large cobble has been <br />placed at the toe of the slope. At the time of this erosion survey, the grading activity had <br />only been completed on a portion of the erosion site. No remediation activities have <br />taken place on erosion site ER02-1722, and the upland banks on this site are much <br /> <br />Williams Fork Res~rvolr <br />Hydroelectri<.: Project <br />January 2004 <br /> <br />Stelgers CorporatIOn <br />Erosion S\lrv~y Report <br /> <br />Pagt' 7 <br />