My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11209
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:32 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:48:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.300.50
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Advisory Council
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/1/1982
Author
CRBSC Advisory Counc
Title
1981 Annual Report on the Colorado River Basin Salinity Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />N <br />m <br />~~. <br />Q <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Of particular interest to the Council is the potential <br />for early construction of the works in the area west of Stage I. <br />The Commissioner of Reclamation has indicated a willingness to <br />consider such action based upon congressional reaction to <br />SB 2202 which amends Public Law 93-320 relating to replacement <br />of incidental wildlife values, That decision should be addressed <br /> <br />following hearings on SB 2202. <br /> <br />Paradox Valley Unit, Colorado - The Paradox Valley Unit, <br />like Grand Valley, has been under intensive study for nearly <br />10 years. Progress on it, like the other units, has been <br />subject to a number of significant delays. On June 25, 1980, <br />USBR advised the Council by letter of a potential delay in <br /> <br />completion of the Paradox Valley Unit. This delay was attri- <br />buted to the need to consider deep well injection as an alternative <br />means of brine disposal. Later in 1980, the results of studies <br />by consulting engineers indicated that deep well injection appears <br />to be a vialbe alternative. USBR should move forward expeditiously <br />on the construction of a test injection well to demonstrate the <br />viability of deep well injection as the acceptable method of <br />brine disposal. <br />Program flexibility should be maintained and if the deep <br />well alternative proves infeasible, planning and field investi- <br /> <br />gation work on the Radium Reservoir alternative should move <br /> <br />forward without delay. Because the Paradox Valley Unit is thB <br /> <br />most cost-effective salinity control measure presently identified, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.