|
<br />Figure 16, Strata 6, width/discharge relationship, results of 4 clusters combined, , , , , , , , , . . . 35
<br />
<br />Figure 17, Strata 6, coefficient of variation for cross section widths to discharge ."""",,36
<br />
<br />Figure 18. Strata 8, habitat composition for modeled flow for six habitat types, , , , , , , , , , , , . 38
<br />
<br />Figure 19, Strata 8, habitat/flow relationships for two clusters combined ",....,...""" 38
<br />
<br />Figure 20, Strata 8, width/discharge relationship for two clusters combined ...., , , , , , , , , , , 39
<br />
<br />Figure 21. Strata 8, coefficient of variation to discharge relationship for 2 clusters combined ,39
<br />
<br />LIST OF TABLES
<br />
<br />Table 1. The river mile and location of sample strata (river reaches) in the Yampa River, Co10ra
<br />do,
<br />199617
<br />
<br />Table 2, The sample strata and habitat clusters and sample dates, Yampa River, Colorado,
<br />
<br />1996..."", ,.. ,.."",. ,., ,........."......,.............,..,..".,18
<br />
<br />Table 3. Habitat types used to characterize the Yampa River during low flow conditions .",20
<br />
<br />Table 4. Comparison of flow from the Maybell gage to flow measured at each habitat cluster
<br />location, Yampa River, Colorado, 1996 "",.............,.,.......",."".20
<br />
<br />Table 5. Flows needed to provide depths of 1.0 ft. across riffles .,..."..,........,...,. 45
<br />
<br />4
<br />
|