My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11194
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11194
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:30 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:47:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.40.J
Description
Yampa
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
2/1/1997
Title
Habitat Availability and Habitat Use of Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River During Baseflow Periods
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Strata 8 <br /> <br />Cluster 3 (rm 94.0) <br /> <br />Seven cross sections were surveyed in this sequence. The control was located on a bedrock <br />shelf and the flow measured in the field was 329 cfs (Appendix 2, Table 10). Total length surveyed <br />in this cluster was 2,904 ft. A short riffle separated a shallow run in the lower half and a deep run <br />in the upper half of this cluster. At flows less than 80 cfs, the dominant habitat type was the <br />shallow pool. Usable pool habitats were very rare in this cluster at all flows modeled. Deep run <br />habitat did not become common until a flow of 329 cfs (24%), and was very rare at flows under 80 <br />cfs (Appendix 2, Table 5). <br /> <br />Cluster 6 (rm 115.5) <br /> <br />Six cross sections were surveyed in this cluster, representing 2,184 ft of river. Flow averaged <br />332 cfs for these cross sections (Appendix 2, Table 11). At 332 cfs, 87% of the area was unusable, <br />cither shallow or fast (Appendix 2, Table 6). The river in this cluster was mostly shallow riffles <br />(Fast) and fast-shallow runs. A long, deep run was located upstream of cross section 4. a riffle that <br />indicated the upper terminus of the sequence. However, since there were no deep habitats between <br />cross sections I and 4, the station was extended upstream into the deep run. A cross section was <br />placed at the lower part of the run (cross section 5) and another near the middle part of the run <br />(cross section 6). Neariy all the usable habitat in this cluster over the modeled range of flows was <br />~ssociated with cross section 6. <br /> <br />Combined clusters in Strata 8 <br /> <br />Figure 18 and Appendix 2, Table 12 show habitat composition when the 13 cross sections in <br />the strata are combined. The total strata reach (33 miles) represented by the] 3 cross sections <br />(5.088 ft) is 2.9 %. Shallow (unusable) pools are the most common habitats available at flows <br />between one and 60 cfs and between 80 and 400 cfs shallow runs are the most common habitat <br />type <br /> <br />Gross surface area increases at a faster rate with flow than usable habitat (Figure 19). The <br />pcrccnt of usable habitat also increased with flow. The clusters in Strata 8 were found to have less <br />Class I and Class II pools habitats than Strata 6. Area of usable habitat increased from 7% at I cfs <br />to 23% at 400 cfs. <br /> <br />The two clusters in this stratum had fairly different width/discharge relationships. At one cfs, <br />Cluster] 15.5 has an average cross section width of64 ft, but it was 106 feet at cluster 94.0 (Figurc <br />20). Mean cross section width (n = 13) at 400 cfs was 235 ft, which is about 84% of the mean <br />channcl width or bankfull flow width (280 ft). <br /> <br />The coefficient of variation for average cross section width/discharge showed that width is <br /> <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.