WSP11191 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

20 methodologies. Serious shortcomings of the IFIM approach in developing flow recommendations for endangered fish in the Upper Colorado River led the Service to initiate a new study for determining recommended summer and winter flows. Using new information obtained from this study as well as that collected by other researchers, the Service updated and refined its earlier flow recommendations (Osmundson et al. 1995). The Service's 1989 flow recommendations for summer were developed by modeling microhabitats based on depth. velocity. and substrate measurements at a site thought to be representative of the reach. The Service's 1991 flow recommendations for winter consisted of a tentative recommendation that flows not fall below historic levels; this recommendation was based on the assumption that historic conditions provided adequate winter habitat for adult fish. In refining these flow recommendations for summer and winter, the Service determined which habitat types (pools, riffles, etc.) were preferred by the fish during these seasons and then determined the flow level at which the preferred habitat types are maximized in area. This approach. as with other instream flow methodologies, assumes that increases in the amount of preferred or optimum habitat increases carrying capacity and, barring other potentially limiting factors, results in an increase in population size. Earlier Service flow recommendations for spring were based on information on how the decrease in magnitude of spring flows could negatively affect endangered fish reproduction and survival. Data were provided which showed that low spring runoff resulted in lower squawfish larval production. The explanation for this relationship was that high flows are periodically needed to build cobble bars and flush fine sediment from the gravel/cobble substrates used by squawfish for spawning. Data were also provided which showed that on the Colorado River, razorback sucker spawning coincides with the peak runoff and occurs in warm, off-channel ponds and inundated floodplain habitats (Osmundson and Kaeding 1991). The explanation for low razorback sucker reproduction was that, currently, flows often do not reach levels high enough to inundate low-lying floodplain features where spawning takes place. The Service also reported that in the absence of high spring flows, important backwater habitats filled with silt and sand, tamarisk colonized sand and cobble bars, and nonnative minnows capable of preying on or competing with larval endangered fishes greatly increased in numbers. The Service's earlier flow recommendations for spring identified the magnitude and frequency of a range of minimum peak flows and the mean monthly flows capable of producing these peaks and of maintaining the natural shape of the hydrograph. Refinement of these earlier flow recommendations for spring was based on the results of new streambed monitoring studies. The results of two