Laserfiche WebLink
<br />problem. Water users and their interests <br />were in a precarious state, <br /> <br />Delph Carpenter sought a better answer, He <br />wished to avoid further submission to the <br />courts of questions which could be more <br />sympathetically weighed by men who knew <br />irrigation and irrigation needs and methods - <br />the farmers themselves, their engineers, their <br />water distribution officials and their legal <br />advisors. Determined that no more <br />expensive litigation should be saddled on the <br />shoulders of Colorado water users and of <br />western water users generally, if he could <br />avoid it, Carpenter through constant reading <br />and study found the answer, <br /> <br />In a decision by Mr, Justice Holmes which <br />involved western waters, a chance <br />suggestion had pointed to the settlement of <br />water quarrels by the states themselves, As <br />he read and searched he learned that, early <br />in our nation's history the question of the <br />exact location of the boundary lines between <br />some of the original thirteen states had been <br />settled under a provision of the Constitution <br />which saves to the states the right to contract <br />with each other, with the consent of <br />Congress. He studied the opinions in cases <br />where boundary questions were considered <br />by the great lawyers who occupied the <br />Supreme Court bench during the years when <br />the nation was forming, <br /> <br />If states can draw a line across lands so as <br />to fix the limits of each state's ownership, <br />Carpenter contended, they can just as <br />certainly draw a line across the flow of a <br />river. True, different problems are presented <br />where a western stream of uncertain flow, <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />with torrential cloudbursts and frequent and <br />prolonged dry spells, Is the subject for <br />division. But just as surely as men can <br />measure human rights and are willing to <br />accept the hardships from low flows while <br />they claim the benefits from peak flows, the <br />result can be accomplished. It took years to <br />induce others to agree with him. But <br />COlorado's outstanding irrigation lawyer knew <br />he was right. The insistent, logical, <br />persuasive arguments of the man with "the <br />piercing blue eyes, the twinkling blue eyes, <br />the understanding blue eyes," finally got the <br />job done. <br /> <br /> <br />The legislatures of many states had to be <br />sold on the idea first. These bodies must <br />establish river commissions with power to sit <br />around a treaty-table with representatives <br />from other states and "equitably allocate" the <br />benefits flowing from a river. And after the <br />commissions had been authorized to act by <br />legislative measures, there came the job of <br />finding men with sufficient understanding of <br />irrigation practices and needs, and equipped <br />with the. ability and courage, to adequately <br />represent their states, <br /> <br />First, Nebraska and Colorado worked out <br />their differences over the flow of the South <br />Platte in a fashion which has proved <br />satisfactory ever since the Compact was <br />executed years ago with Delph Carpenter as <br />Oolorado's commissioner and with Robert H. <br />Willis acting for Nebraska. <br /> <br />Came the controversy over the water of La <br />Plata, a little stream rising in the La Plata <br />Mountains a few miles inside Colorado and <br />flowing swiftly across the interstate line into <br />