Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1. <br /> <br />'" <br />... <br />..... <br />~ .5 <br />.0 <br />Ctl <br />... <br />..... <br />" <br />tI) <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />000 n 'i <br /> <br />Whooping Crane Roosting Habitat Suitability Indices <br /> <br />(a) <br /> <br />(b) <br /> <br />Unobstructed Channel WIdth <br />at W Crane Roost SItes <br />on the Platte RIVer <br /> <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />...-. <br /> <br />. <br />" <br />c <br />o <br />'Zs <br />" <br />> <br />" <br />ll. <br />,Q <br />o <br />'0- <br />" <br />" <br />~. <br />" <br />z <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />'100 <br /> <br />SlID- .. .. .,. taD- >'ItCl) <br />aD .DD 7. tCID tUII <br />Unobstructed Channel WIdth (ft) <br /> <br />400 800 1200 <br />Channel Width (ft) <br /> <br />(d) <br /> <br />(c) <br />Channel Wldths <br />m the Central Platte <br />ca.n:.: PWlIaD.., 8tadyJ <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />!l <br />C <br />~40 <br />Q) <br />" <br />'" <br />~30 <br />::E <br /> <br />N <br />, <br />-20 <br />... <br />o <br />" <br />" <br />-:l to <br />" <br />Z <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Preference FunctlDn for <br />Unobstructed Channel WIdths <br />Used by Whooping Cranes <br />--. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />><~ <br />",Q <br />'0" <br />c-=. <br />-" <br />!:~ <br />lj" <br />t'2 <br />..... <br />"'" <br />"::l <br />a.~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />(100 IlJOo 300- 5lJOo 7lJOo 9lJOo )1100 <br />300 600 700 9DO 1100 <br />Max Channel Width (ft) PWlI'"' <br /> <br />(tDOUlD-KIl>...,ao.fOO.ttOl> <br />D.CIl7C11901:1ttl101300 <br />Unobstructed Channel WIdth (ft) <br /> <br />Figure A1. The SI curve for channel width (a) was developed based on <br />available data and expert opinion. Channel width data was collected <br />at 23 roost sites from 1983-1991 (b). A Type III preference index <br />for channel width (d) was constructed by computing the ratio of use <br />(b) to availability (c) for each width class (Bovee 1986). The <br />database of available channel widths was from the Service's Platte <br />River Ecology Study (1981). This database reported only the widest <br />channel in each 1/2 mile river segment. As a result, preference is <br />probably somewhat overestimated for the 300-500 foot width class, and <br />severely overestimated for the 100-300 foot width class. <br />