Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0009n3 <br /> <br />The guilding approach, though it is theoretically more <br />appropriate for modeling than the single-species approach, should <br />be evaluated in the context of the overall PHABSIM process. The <br />effect of including additional characteristic species (such as <br />invertebrates) should also be evaluated. More work must be <br />conducted to address special habitat types (e.g., sloughs, <br />backwaters, etc.), either by aerial photography or additional <br />field work (i.e., placement of transects through special habitat <br />types). Cover codes need to be evaluated and standardized for <br />all HSI curves and transect data. Additional information which <br />may become available in the future should also be reviewed and <br />target flows be revised accordingly. Any new information on <br />physical microhabitat variables that may be forthcoming would <br />follow the procedures outlined above for reducing and analyzing <br />the data. <br /> <br />Recommended Tarqets: <br /> <br />Flows at and below 1100 cfs should not be reduced beyond their <br />present frequency of occurrence. Flows between 0 and 800 cfs <br />should be improved by any additional water available. Any <br />additional available water should first be applied to improve the <br />lowest flow conditions below 800 cfs from June 15 to August 31. <br />Flow pulses during other periods of the year are important to <br />maintenance of fishery and aquatic ecology and are addressed by <br />the wet meadow recommendation. <br /> <br />Decreases in flows below a 1100 cfs target reduce availability of <br />the best fishery habitat as presented by PHABSIM model output. <br />Specialized habitats such as backwaters, sloughs, and side <br />channels also become less available at flows below 1100 cfs and <br />will result in the reduction of important deep water habitats <br />along the river edges, specialized spawning and nursery habitats, <br />and prevalence of vegetated shoreline habitats along sandbars and <br />river banks. An 1100 cfs flow was formerly recommended by the <br />Nebraska Game and Parks Commission during winter to reduce the <br />incidence of ice cover on the river and maintain a foraging area <br />for bald eagles. <br /> <br />Flows reduced below 800 cfs will increase both the frequency and <br />duration of lethal water temperatures throughout the central <br />Platte River. Flow reductions may increase the potential for <br />non-native species (i.e., Gambusia affinis) that are more <br />tolerant of adverse conditions to displace native species (i.e., <br />plains topminnow) (Pflieger 1975, Lee and Burgess 1978, Lynch <br />1988) thus changing both the species composition and abundance of <br />the central Platte River forage fish community. This <br />recommendation will aid in meeting the stated goal (Biology <br />workgroup 1990): "to provide an adequate riverine environment to <br />sustain the maximum diversity and abundance of forage fishes <br />needed to support the recovery goals for endangered species." <br /> <br />12 <br />