My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11122
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:44:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/3000
Title
OPINION - Colorado River Salinity Problem - Submitted to His Excellency - Honorable Antonio Carillo Flores - Ambassador of Mexico
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />l <br />J <br /> <br />~j <br /> <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />o <br />~ <br />. <br />.... <br /> <br />:1 <br />l <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />were increasing it was feared that the quality of return <br />flow water would progressively deteriorate and testimony <br />at the hearings indicated that it had been the view that the <br />United States should not be responsible because of ulti- <br />mate conditions on the river." R. J. Tipton, an authori- <br />tative witness who had been present during negotiation of <br />the treaty as a consulting engineer, set forth this position <br />during the hearings; <br /> <br />Senator Downey. Suppose the terms of this treaty <br />were embodied in a water compact between some com- <br />pany selling water and a water user, and the same <br />language were used, applying, so far as you think it <br />applies, to the quality of water; do yon think that un- <br />der that language the seller of water could make the <br /> <br />88 In favor of ratification, Fred E. Wilson of the New Mexico Interstate <br />Streams Commission testified as follows: <br /> <br />Senator Downey. Well, Judge Wilson, if, looking allCad to ultimato <br />development in the river, to the retul'll flow wo may expect, and to tho <br />salinity resulting, there is a probability-we will assume there is a <br />probability-that that water will be so saline as to be largely valueless, <br />do you not think that if we 'arc going to rely upon the fact that Mexico <br />must take that, we ought to spell it out in plain language, so that <br />Mexico will be obligated to take return fi{)w and socpage--to take this <br />wator generally-however saline or nonusable it may bet <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson. I do not think it would be t() the advnntage of tho United <br />States to spell it out if you want ,a treaty. <br /> <br />Senator Downey. Judge Wilson, is tho implication from that remark <br />that if wo say to Mexico ill this treaty what we arc saying here in this <br />room, Mexico probably would not take the tr6"atyi <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson. Well, what I mean, Senator, is that if you spell it out <br />and use aU those words you used about tho bad quality of the water, <br />umI made her agree that she was going to- take it, I think that would <br />be unnceessa,ry. As I see the salinity question, it is a question in other <br />places besides thoso in this treaty. For instance, take between Texas <br />and New Mexico. Down in 'l'exas tho water- is very salty and is getting <br />morc so an the time. But that is a problem that, so far as I know, <br />nobody has yet solved. Certahlly the United States caunot take the <br />position or accept the responsibility for tho incrcas.cd salinity in tho <br />water in the years that go by; otherwise, it would take all of tho water <br />away eventually for the lower user. <br /> <br />Hearings, pt. 5, at 1588. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.