My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11122
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:44:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/3000
Title
OPINION - Colorado River Salinity Problem - Submitted to His Excellency - Honorable Antonio Carillo Flores - Ambassador of Mexico
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />=* <br />W <br />W <br />.(C <br /> <br />into three parts: testimony indicating that the parties <br />intended to credit the United States for all return flow, <br />regardless of quality; testimony indicating that credit was <br />to be received for waters of any kind; and testimony that <br />waters to be delivered would correspond to that utilized <br />by lower users in the United States. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />a. Credit for Return Flow Watersl <br />Regardless of Quality <br /> <br />In testimony before the ]'oreign Relations Committee, <br />L. M. Lawson, American Commissioncr on the Inter- <br />national Boundary Commission who had headcd thc United <br />States negotiating team, emphasized the difference be- <br />tween the proposed treaty and the Mead offer of 1929 which <br />had been rejected by Mexico, indicating that the treaty <br />would give credit to the United States for return flow <br />waters: <br /> <br />Mr. Lawson. The treaty itself fixes for all time the <br />obligation of the United States and the amount of <br />water which Mexico will receive. 'l'hat amount of <br />water we believe is eveu less than was offered to <br />Mexico in 1929, because, in just the reverse of that <br />offer, this treaty proposes to credit the United States <br />with all the return flow in the river, all the waste water <br />that may arrive at the boundary line,''' which has been <br />estimated, in various ways, by various persons, to <br />amount to, we will say, an average of at least 900,000 <br />acre-feet. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />:3<.1 "Waste wa.ter" was defined by n, J. Tipton, a consulting engineer <br />present during the negotiation of the treaty, in the following: <br /> <br />Mr. Tipton. Now, as a pal't of l'cttl1ll How, it must be unclerstood that <br />thoro arc what arc called wastes. I choose to caU them regulation lo88es. <br />"Waste" is an odiolls word "vhell we arc denling with water. There must <br />bo a certain amount of water in a caJwl to carry tho bnlance of the <br />water thl'ought [sic 1 to the cnd of the ennal. It is impossible to carry <br />to tho onel of tlw ~anal tho 'oxact ,amount tltu.t is going to be ncedc(l <br />at that point. So we necessarily have to hu.ve regulation rctUl'l~s. . . . <br /> <br />Hearings Beforo the Se"nato Committee on Foreign Relations on Treaty, with <br />Mexico Relating to tho Utilizrrtion of the Waters of Certain Rivers, 79th <br />Cong., 1st Sess., pt. 3, 969 (1945-) (hereina.fter cited as Hea.rings). <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />r-..-----'---------- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.