My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11116
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:10 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:44:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8056
Description
Drought Preparedness
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
2/1/1976
Author
Dept of Water Resour
Title
Special Report on Dry Year Impacts in California
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br /> <br />003014 <br /> <br />THE DRY YEAR, 1975-76 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The State of California usually has any kind of water <br />year except a normal year. This variability is illustrated <br />in Figure 1, "Seasonal Precipitation at Sacramento." Precip- <br />itation so far this year has been far enough below normal to <br />rank as one of the record dry periods. <br /> <br />Of the ten years in this century that rank as the driest <br />through the month of January, seven have gone on to be notably <br />dry years and three have had sufficent precipitation after <br />February 1 that very few recall that the year started out to be <br />dry. Those who do remember include those who suffered from <br />dried up rangeland and small grain crops or from lack of snow <br />for winter recreation. <br /> <br />Some of the impacts of the lack of precipitation <br />have already occurred and are discussed in this report. Future <br />impacts will depend on the amount of precipitation during February, <br />March, and April. This report assumes two possible precipitation <br />conditions for the remaining months of the water year and dis- <br />cusses possible future impacts for each. One would have lower <br />quartile precipitation for the reminder of the year, that is, <br />the precipitation will not exceed that for the lowest one- <br />quarter of the years of record. The other condition would have <br />normal precipitation for the remainder of the year. The report <br />also contains a discussion of the impacts if lower quartile <br />precipitation occars during the remainder of this year and next <br />year also has only lower quartile precipitation. <br /> <br />The report shows the impact that has already occurred <br />on agriculture, winter recreation, and fire suppression due to <br />the dry period throughout the first of February. It also pro- <br />jects the effects under the assumed conditions on agriculture, <br />municipal and industrial water supplies, recreation, fish and <br />wildlife, forestry, and energy for the remainder of this year <br />and for next year if that should also prove to be dry. <br /> <br />The Statewide Picture Today <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Water Year 1975-76 from its beginning October 1, <br />1975, to the present, February 1, 1976, has been one of the <br />driest years of record. Both precipitation and snowpack are <br />far below normal in all parts of the State. This has resulted <br />in flow in most of the smaller streams at decreasing rates since <br />November 1, a period when the flow would ordinarily increase. <br />The only bright part of the water picture is that there are a <br />number of large reservoirs which were filled during the abundant <br />runoff in the spring of 1975. These reservoirs still have about <br />normal quantities of water in storage for this time of year. <br /> <br />-1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.