Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />l <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />r <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />003020 <br /> <br />IMPACTS <br /> <br />The major impact of lack of precipitation thus far <br />in the 1975-76 water year has been felt by dry farmed agricul- <br />ture. Winter sports losses are second in magnitude. Estimates <br />of further impacts are discussed for two conditions this spring: <br />I. if precipitation is normal the rest of the year, and 2. if <br />it is in the lower quartile (not greater than the best of the <br />lowest 25% of the years of record). The estimated percent of <br />average runoff of 4 major str'~ams under these two conditions <br />is shown in Table 3. In addition, the impacts are estimated <br />if this year's precipitation continues at the lower quartile <br />and is followed by lower quartile precipitation in 1976-77. <br /> <br />Agriculture <br /> <br />A report by the Department of Food and Agriculture, <br />January 28, 1976, contains an estimate of $310 million of <br />agricultural loss thus far because of the dry season. <br /> <br />Tab le 3 <br /> <br />1975-76 WatE,r Year Projected Flows <br />in Percent of Average <br /> <br /> Projected flow <br /> Project flow percentage based <br /> percentaqe based on 50% of normal <br /> on normal precip. precip. and snow <br />Basin and snow accumu- accumulation <br /> lation after (Approximate <br /> Feb. 1, 1976 lower quartile) <br /> after Feb. 1, 1976 <br />Shasta Inflow <br />(Includes Pit, 67% 53% <br />McCloud, Sacto. R.) <br />American R. <br />Inflow to Folsom 50% 30% <br />Kings R. I <br />Inf low to Pine Flat ! 52% 23% <br /> I <br />Kern R. I <br />Inflow to Isabella I 57% 32% <br /> ! <br /> <br />-13- <br />