Laserfiche WebLink
<br />USBRlMWD SALINITY MANAGEMENT STUDY <br />FINAL REPORT <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Figure 3- I <br /> <br />w <br />en <br /><=> <br />GO <br /> <br />Historical Federal Funding <br /> <br />Appropriations for Implementation of <br />Colorado River Salinity Control Program <br />Upstream of Imperial Dam 1988.1997 <br /> <br />$60.01- <br /> <br />$50.0 /r...M. <br /> <br />$40.0 / <br /> <br /> <br />$10.0 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />. <br />c <br />~ $30.0 _/ <br />iii <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />$20.0 <br /> <br />$0.0 <br /> <br />1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 <br />Federal Fiscal Year <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Metropolitan and other CRW users would benefit from a lower salinity objective at Parker <br />Dam. However, significant cost increases would result as indicated in Table 3-1. <br /> <br /> <br />Table 3-1 <br /> <br />Numeric Criterion below <br />Parker Dam <br /> <br />Annual Cost <br /> <br />747 mglL <br />700 mglL <br />650 mglL <br /> <br />$25 million <br /> <br />$85 million <br /> <br />$150 million <br /> <br />To reduce the numeric criterion will require consensus among and financial commitments by <br />the seven basin states and three federal agencies now engaged in the Salinity Control Program. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Given the existing standards, additional near-term reductions in salinity could be achieved if <br />salinity control measures are accelerated and the corresponding state share (about 30percent) <br /> <br />BOOKMAN-EDMONSTON <br />ENGINEERING, INC. 3-3 <br />O:ILOCAlRESIANDYSISALlNITY\JUNE9B-217SECT3.DOC 07/20/9B 10:59 AM <br /> <br />Section 3 <br />Evaluation of Potential Regional <br />Salinity Management Strategies <br />