My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11089
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:42:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/1/1995
Author
USDOI-BOR
Title
Newsletter - Colorado River Studies Office - Vol.9 - Final Edition
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Adaptive Management <br />(Continued from Page 3) <br /> <br />Dam operations must be met. The importance of the AMP <br />in ensuring the implementation of the selected alternative <br />and in evaluating its effectiveness in meeting natural <br />resource management objectives cannot be overemphasized. <br /> <br />Within the next few years, it will be the primary task of the <br />AMP to specifically identify resource management objectives <br />and then design experiments, implement studies, and moni- <br />tor research with the specific objective of determining what <br />pattern of flows from the dam is best for endangered fish. <br />Let there be no doubt that in the final analysis, the selection <br />of the EIS preferred alternative was driven by more <br />questions than answers over what will happen to humpback <br /> <br />chub and razorback suckers under differing flow scenarios. <br />If there were not such dramatic differences in power mar. <br />keting parameters between the SASF and MLFF alternatives, <br />the situation would not be so critical. As the preferred <br />alternative now reads, experimental steady flows will be <br />implemented automatically in the spring/summer 1998 unless <br />an ongoing risk assessment to endangered fish indicates <br />steady flows will be harmful. Very specific research <br />questions on endangered fish beg answers before we really <br />understand how best to operate Glen Canyon Dam. Such is <br />the immediate responsibility of the Adaptive Management <br />Program process. <br /> <br /> <br />Cultural Resources: <br /> <br />Where We Are and Where We are Going <br />By: Janet BaIsom, EIS Team Member <br />Grand Canyon National Park <br /> <br />The cultural resources program associated with the Glen <br />Canyon Dam environmental impact statement and Glen <br />Canyon Environmental Studies has numerous components <br />which all contribute to management of the resources along <br />the Colorado River corridor. These components consist of <br />archaeological studies, geomorphic research, and tribal <br />ethnohistories, which together help guide the long.term <br />research and monitoring of these irreplaceable resources. <br /> <br />The archaeological inventory of the Colorado River corridor <br />was completed in 1991 by the National Park Service (NPS). <br />The final report on the survey was released last month. The <br />geomorphic work is continuing, with open file reports on the <br />work that has been completed available through the U.S. <br />Geological Survey. Tribal reports are nearing completion <br />and will be available on a limited basis in the near future. <br /> <br />The unifying management tool for cultural resources is <br />derived from the National Historic Preservation Act. For <br />the Glen Canyon Dam program, Reclamation, NPS, the <br />Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer, the Advisory <br />Council on Historic Preservation, and the Hualapai, <br />Havasupai, Hop~ Kaibab Paiute, Navajo, San Juan Southern <br />Paiute, Shivwits Paiute, and the. Zuni Tribes have coordi- <br />nated their responsibilities and concerns and agreed to a <br />long.term program through a "Programmatic Agreement" <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />(PA). This agreement, negotiated among all of the parties, <br />directs Reclamation and NPS to conduct a program which <br />ensures the preservation of sites and in-situ preservation, <br />wherever possible, along the Colorado River. The signa- <br />tories to the agreement are currently drafting the final <br />Historic Preservation Plan (HPP), which will include the <br />specifics on implementation of the program as identified in <br />the P A. <br /> <br />The HPP will guide the long-term monitoring and remedial <br />actions associated with site preservation along the river <br />corridor. Preservation is the ultimate goal, one shared by <br />the agencies and the tribes. The means by which sites are <br />stabilized or protected vary, and considerable discussion has <br />taken place among the signatories of the P A over appropri- <br />ate methods for site protection. A workshop will be held in <br />May 1995 to further discuss methods and techniques for site <br />preservation. All of the signatories will be participating, <br />along with specia1ists in site stabilization. A field trip to <br />begin implementation of preservation methods is scheduled <br />for early September. <br /> <br />The program is moving forward and will benefit all of the <br />cultural resources of Glen and Grand Canyons. We hope <br />that our efforts will provide for lasting protection of these <br />significant and fragile pieces of the past. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.