Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />[, <br /> <br />': <br />I <br /> <br />f, <br />I <br />f <br /> <br />~ "1 <br />. " <br />..JW <br /> <br />OPE R A TI 0 NAN D ~I A I N TEN A NeE <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br />AgriclIlturol water investigations <br /> <br />Studies concerning the effects of treated and untreated Colorado <br />River water on the growth of agricultural and ornamental plants <br />were continued in the field and greenhouse. The tolerance of camel- <br />lia and gladiolus to soil salinity was investigated using sand culture <br />techniques, <br />The orange tree, in the citrus irrigation experiment conducted <br />in cooperation with the University of California on a 13,5-acre sec- <br />tion of the District groves at La Verne have been irrigated since <br />1942 with natural and softened Colorado River water and local <br />well water, Fruit yields have been measured each year in the three <br />sections of the grove. No difference in yield has occurred on the <br />plots irrigated with natural Colorado River water and local well <br />water, but a small reduction in yield was observed during the past <br />two seasons for the crop of Washington navel oranges irrigated <br />with the softened Colorado River wateT, No d;freTence, between <br />the three treatments was noted for the Valencia orange yields. <br />Gypsum was applied on a portion of the softened Colorado River <br />water plot in the spring of 1949 in order to observe its effect on <br />improving ,\'ields and soil conditions. <br />The educational program to assist both commercial and amateur <br />growers in solving their cultural problems was continued by lec- <br />tures before groups and personal interviews:. <br /> <br />QlIality of Colorado River water <br /> <br />An average analysis of Colorado River water as received at and <br />delivered from the softening and filtration plant during the fiscal <br />year 1948-49 is given in table 6, The quality of the nattiral water <br />by months is given in table 7 and the quality of the softened water <br />by months in table 8. Due to the increased hardness of the water <br />released during the period of peak fiow through the softening plant, <br />the average hardness of the finished water for the year was 133 <br />parts per million, which is slightly higher than the desired 125 <br />parts per million, In table 9 are given the data on the operation <br />of the zeolite softeners, The slight increase in the quantity of salt <br />required per part of hardness removed is a reflection of the in- <br />creased age of the siiiceous zeolite in the softener units. <br />Chemical control of the quality of water maintained throughout <br />the softening prOfe" required the partial analysis of approxima- <br />tely 11,000 samples taken at various stages in the process, In addi- <br />tion, 1,460 samples were taken at the plant for bacteriological <br />