Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..'~ r.. Q <br />~. '..., <br />90 1,.'; ~ METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT <br /> <br />Supreme Court of the State of California on September 23, 1948. <br />As a result of this decision the District will recover substantial <br />sums by way of interest on moneys deposited in court as a <br />prerequisite to obtaining immediate possession of lands being con- <br />demned in Riverside County. Steps to determine the exact amounts <br />due and to obtain payment are pending. <br /> <br />TAxES-Taxes levied by the Metropolitan Water District are <br />collected through the county tax collector's office. In instances in <br />which taxpayers have sued to recover taxes alleged to have been <br />collected unlawfully by the county, the District frequently is made <br />a party. Litigation of this character is handled by the county <br />counsel's office, with the cooperation of the District's legal staff. <br />Actions which had been filed on behalf of Defense Plant Cor- <br />poration or its successor Reconstruction Finance Corporation <br />against the County of Los Angeles and other taxing agencies in that <br />county, including the District, to recover taxes paid under protest. <br />were settled during the fiscal year covered by this report. Plaintiff <br />asserted that machinery and equipment had been assessed incor- <br />rectly as fixtures or improvements on land and hence were taxcd <br />as real property within the consent granted by Congress to local <br />taxation of rea] property owued by plaintiff, whereas the items <br />should have been assessed as personal property which was exempt <br />from local taxation. Di:-5crimination also Wa~ charged on the ground <br />that similar machinery and equipment in private ownership had <br />been assessed and taxed as personal propert.\'. thereby relieving it <br />from the Los Ange]es County Flood Control District taxes. Under <br />the leadership of the county counsel, the forty-seven suits. in which <br />recovery of the aggregate sum of $4,668,635.49 was sought, were <br />settled for a total refund of $100,000. Of the aggregate sum sought <br />to be recovered by plaintiff the District's portion amounted to <br />$302,097.19, and the District's portion of the sum of $100,000 <br />refunded in settlement amounted to $6.686.82. <br /> <br />CLAIMS INVOLVING THE UNITED STATES-Representatives of the <br />District legal staff assisted in the preparation of evidence and at- <br />tended hearings in the Federal District Court in the case of United <br />States v. Knapp, et a!., an action brought by the United States to <br />condemn t.wo parcels of land in the Parker reservoir area, not pre- <br />viously acquired. The amounts properly recovered against the United <br />States in this proceeding will be reimbursable by the District under <br />its contract with the United States for the construction of Parker <br />Dam. <br />