|
<br />Co.)
<br />""-l
<br />'I
<br />Co.)
<br />
<br />Table 15 presents the investment cost, annual cost, and cost-
<br />effectiveness for each alternative. In all cases, only the costs of
<br />delivering water to the powerplant boundary were included, The
<br />additional costs within the plant boundary for using the saline water
<br />for cool ing or credits for the value of an alternative source of
<br />water were not considered at this pOint in the analysis.
<br />
<br />Table 15. - Investment and annual costs - local use options
<br /> Cos t-
<br /> Investment Annua 1 effectiveness
<br />Unit cost 1/ cost Y $ per mg/L
<br />8ig Sandy River $145,150,000 $14,550,000 $1,820,000
<br />Grand Valley 95,000,000 9,000,000 750,000
<br />Lower Gunnison 66,700,000 6,300,000 900,000
<br />McElmo Creek 70,112,000 6,104,000 1,017,000
<br />Uinta Basin 64,000,000 6,300,000 790,000
<br />Price River 47,000,000 5,000,000 1,000,000
<br />San Rafael River 37,000,000 4,000,000 1,330,000
<br />LaVerkin Springs 24,304,000 3,135,000 392,000
<br />Las Vegas Wash 289,000,000 29,000,000 810,000
<br />Palo Verde District 40,000,000 5,000,000 625,000
<br />Total $878,266,000 $88,389,000 $ 943,400
<br /> (average)
<br />
<br />1/ Includes interest during construction.
<br />f! Includes operation, maintenance, and replacement costs.
<br />
<br />V-8
<br />
|