Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Table 3. - Public participation groups <br /> <br />Contacts <br /> <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br /> <br />Department of Energy <br />Colorado River Basin Salinity <br />Control Advisory Council and <br />Forum <br />Western Area Power Administration <br /> <br />Environmental Protection Agency <br /> <br />Energy Development Interests - <br />Electric Power Research <br />Institute and WEST Associates <br />Office of Water Research and <br />Technology and Utah State <br />University <br />Environmental Interests - <br />Environmental Defense Fund, <br />Trout Unlimited, and National <br />Wildlife Federation <br /> <br />Expertise <br /> <br />Identify fish, wildlife, and <br />environmental concerns <br />Energy development sites <br />Legal and institutional concerns <br />and potential resolution <br /> <br />Siting of future coal-fired <br />powerplants <br />Water and energy policy and <br />program implementation <br />Use of water for powerplant <br />cooling and coal slurry <br />pipelines <br />Research studies on use of <br />saline waters <br /> <br />Environmental impacts <br /> <br />On July 1, 1981, in Las Vegas, the public was given the opportunity to <br />comment on the draft special report. Many comments were received and <br />considered in preparing the final special report. Letters of support and <br />indications of interest in participating were received and are appended to <br />the main report. <br /> <br />Alternative Plans and Evaluation Basis <br /> <br />The alternatives selected for preliminary study exemplify a range of <br />options based on public input and judgment of the Bureau of Reclamation <br />planning team. The alternatives arrayed a range of options covering some <br />of the technical possibilities as well as bracketing system costs and <br />relative cost-effectiveness. The alternatives were grouped into two major <br />categories: local use for energy development and long distance transport <br />for use and/or disposal. No attempt was made to optimize systems or <br />components of plans because of their preliminary status. The alterna- <br />tives were developed to provide relative cost-effective comparisons with <br />current structural control measures. <br /> <br />Study was made of the local use by linking saline sources with nearby (less <br />than 100-mile delivery) powerplants for cooling water supply. Detailed <br />analysis was made for three specific sites, and another seven sites were <br />studied in less detail to present a more complete range of site sensitivity <br />costs and total local use potential. <br /> <br />6 <br />