Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, TABLE --B...._ <br />EFFECT OF GENERATING'l'IRM ENERGY AT HOOVER <br /> <br />STUDY NUMBER <br /> <br />32 29R <br />8.25 8.25 <br />98.4 98.4 <br />1190 1190 <br />1100 HOO <br />8400 Firm Power 1- <br />9500 Firm Power l <br />Base Base <br /> <br />Minimum Release from Upper Basin, Mil.AF/Yr. <br /> <br />Upper Basin Rule C~rve Probability, percent <br /> <br />,Lake Mead rule eiev. above which additional <br />.Lower Basin use assumed <br /> <br />Lake Mead rule elev. below which Lower Basin <br />shortage assumed <br /> <br />Lake Mead demand - 1970,thru 1979, 1000 AF/Yr. <br /> <br />Lake Mead demand '- 1980 and after <br /> <br />Upper Basin depletion schedule <br /> <br />Sequence No. <br /> <br />8 - 1941 through 1908 <br /> <br />Year 2000 Content, Lake Powell 1000 AF <br /> <br />16,062 <br /> <br />16,017 <br /> <br />Year 2000 Content, Lake Mead 1000 AF <br /> <br />13,809 <br /> <br />12,705, <br /> <br />31-year average in 1000 AF <br /> <br />Add~tional Upper Basin Use After 1968 <br /> <br />Lake Powell Release <br /> <br />1,336 1,336 <br />9',098 9,149 <br />8,864 8,766 <br />2 231 <br />71 48 <br />182 258 <br /> <br />Lower Basin Use (inc. Mexico S Surplus) <br /> <br />Lower Basin Waste (Unusable Spill) <br /> <br />Lower Basin Uses Above 7 1/2 MAF <br /> <br />Lower Basin Shortage in 7 1/2 MAr (CAP) <br /> <br />31-year average in MKWH <br /> <br />Upper Basin Energy <br /> <br />'5,362 <br /> <br />5,300 <br /> <br />Lower Basin Energy <br /> <br />4,875 <br /> <br />4,863 <br /> <br />1/ Firm p~wer through 1987 at 83% efficiency. <br /> <br />25 <br />