Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE 7 <br /> <br />EFFECT OF LEVEL OF LAKE MEAD BELOW WHICH SHORTAGE IN ARIZONA DIVERSIONS <br />ARE ASSUMED <br /> <br />STUDY NUHBER <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />Minimum Release from Upper Basin Mil.AF/Yr. <br /> <br />8.25 8.25 <br />90.5 90.5 <br />1190 1190 <br />1100 1070 <br />" SIIOO 81100 <br />9500 9500 <br />Base Base <br /> <br />Upper Basin Rule ~urve Probability. percent <br /> <br />'Lake Me~~ rule elev. above which additional <br />.LowerBa~in use assumed <br /> <br />Lake Mead rule elev. below which Lower Basin <br />shortage assumed <br /> <br />Lake Mead demand - 1970 thru 1979. 1000 AF/Yr. <br /> <br />La~e Mead demand - 1980 and after <br /> <br />Upper Basin depletion schedule <br /> <br />l/ Hoover below elevation 1083 during 1997. <br /> <br />Sequence No. <br /> <br />8 - 19111 through 1908 <br /> <br />Year 2000 Content. Lake Powell 1000 AF <br /> <br />13,763 <br /> <br />12.607 <br /> <br />Year 2000 Content, Lake Mead 1000 AF <br /> <br />13.795 <br /> <br />12,626 <br /> <br />31-year average in 1000 AF <br />Add~tional Upper Basin Use After 1968 <br /> <br />1.337 <br /> <br />1.337 <br /> <br />Lake Powell Release <br /> <br />9.209 <br /> <br />9,253. <br /> <br />Lower Basin Use (Inc. ~le"ico & Surplus) <br /> <br />8.965 <br /> <br />9,058 <br /> <br />Lower Basin Waste (Unusable Spin) <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Lower Basin'Uses ,Above 7 1/2 MAr <br /> <br />811 <br /> <br />811 <br /> <br />Lower Basin Shortage in 7 l/2 MAr (CAP) <br /> <br />93 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />~l-year average in ~wH <br />"n,:~~" <br /> <br />Upper Basin Energy <br /> <br />, 5.379 <br /> <br />5.385 <br />11,790 1/ <br /> <br />Lower Basin Energy <br /> <br />~. 11.9112 <br /> <br />31-year average in Mil-Yr. <br />Upper Basin Capability <br />Lower Basin Capability <br /> <br />1.333 <br /> <br />1.329 <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />1,568 <br /> <br />1.11117 <br />