Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE _L <br /> <br />EFFECT OF RATE ,OF 'INCREASE IN UPPER BASIN DE~LETIONS <br /> <br />STUDY NUHBER <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br />Minimum Release from Upper Basin Mil.AF/Yr. <br /> <br />8.25 <br /> <br />8.25 <br /> <br />Upper Basin Rule C~rve Probability, percent <br /> <br />. Lake Mead rule elev. above which additional <br />.Lower Basin use assumed <br /> <br />98.4 <br /> <br />98.4 <br /> <br />1190 <br /> <br />1190 <br /> <br />Lake Nead rule elev. below which Lower Basin <br />shortage assumed <br /> <br />1100 <br /> <br />1100 <br /> <br />Lake Mead demand - 1970,thru 1979, 1000 AF/Yr. <br /> <br />8400 <br /> <br />8400 <br /> <br />La~e Mead demand - 1980 and after, 1000 AF/Yr. <br /> <br />9500 <br /> <br />9500 <br /> <br />Upper Basin depletion schedule <br /> <br />Base <br /> <br />Rapid <br /> <br />Sequence No. 12 - 1961 through 1928 <br />Year 2000 Content, Lake Powell 1000 AF 21,124 22,659 <br /> . . <br />Year 2000 Content, Lake Head 1000 AF 21,162 17 ,074, <br />31-year average in 1000 AF <br />Add~tional Upper Basin Use After 1968 1,425 1,977 <br />Lake Powell Release 10,887 18,288 <br />Lower Basin Use CInc. l1exico & Surplus) 9,712 9,592 <br />Lower Basin Waste ( Unusable Spill) 777 483 <br />Lower Basin uses Above 7 1/2 MAF 735 615 <br />Lower Basin Shortage in 7 1/2 MAF (CAP) 0 0 <br />31-year average in HKWH <br />Upper Basin Energy , 6,329 6,073 <br />Lower Basin Energy 6,047 5,775 <br /> <br />14 <br />