Laserfiche WebLink
<br />UUU626 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Prairie Naturalist 24(1): March 1992 <br /> <br />ships at each of our sites was a task far beyond the resources of our study, and <br />our water travel time estimates were as precise as possible with the available <br />data. We accepted the error inherent in our methodology as the only practical <br />means of deriving comparable elevation data at a large number of sites. <br />To estimate the mean and maximum elevation of potentially suitable nesting <br />habitat at a site, we derived a random sample from the transect data and then <br />removed patently unsuitable points according to the following procedure. We <br />computed the elevations of points between actual measured points at 0.3-m (1- <br />ft) intervals by simple linear interpolation. We assigned interpolated points the <br />vegetative characteristics of the nearest measured point, except where a meas- <br />ured point was expressly identified as a boundary between two vegetative cover <br />types on the transect. Where noted, boundary points defined the assignment of <br />vegetative characteristics to interpolated points. We randomly selected 30 <br />points per transect from the combined set of measured and interpolated points. <br />From these 30 points, we selected those having the vegetative cover character- <br />istics observed at nest locations, as measured during the nest site ground survey. <br />We computed the mean and maximum elevations of the final set of points at <br />each site. We tested the hypothesis that the means of these measurements at nest <br />sites and systematic sample sites were equal using independent-sample t-tests. <br />We measured the elevation of each nest relative to the water surface eleva- <br />tion. We computed the nest's elevation above the adjusted datum and its eleva- <br />tion above water at the time of nest initiation in the same manner that the tran- <br />sect elevation data were adjusted to a common datum. We tested the hypothesis <br />that the mean elevation of nests and the mean elevation of sites were equal us- <br />ing paired-sample t-tests. The analysis of nest elevations involved estimating <br />the discharge corresponding to each nest elevation; we determined the mini- <br />mum, median, and maximum of these values for use as reference points in fur- <br />ther analysis of hydrologic records. <br /> <br />Analysis of Hydrologic Records <br />From discharge records for Grand Island, North Bend, and Louisville, NE, <br />gaging stations (U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Data, 1959-1988) we <br />computed mean annual hydrographs and the frequency of occurrence of dis- <br />charges corresponding to nest elevations. <br /> <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />Location of Nesting Sites <br />We located a total of 222 least tern nests at 30 sites and 82 piping plover <br />nests at 30 sites on the Platte River during 1988. Terns nested exclusively at <br />three sites and plovers at three. Most nesting occurred on the Lower Platte <br />(Figs. 2 and 3a). <br />We measured habitat characteristics at 177 tern nests at 26 sites and 60 pip- <br />ing plover nests at 26 sites. Terns nested exclusively at two of these sites and <br />plovers at two. <br />We determined nest initiation dates for 155 of the 177 measured tern nests <br />and for 46 of the 60 piping plover nests (Fig 3b). Tern nest initiation dates <br />