Laserfiche WebLink
<br />lJ1J062~ <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Prairie Naturalist 24(1) March 1992 <br /> <br />Platte between Lexington (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers rivet mile (rm) 251) <br />and Chapman, NE (rm 157). The reach of the Central Platte between Chapman <br />and the mouth of the Loup River was excluded because it has not been used for <br />nesting for about 10 years. We examined the entire Lower Platte (rm 0-101). <br />For some analyses, the Lower Platte was divided further into the reaches above <br />and below the mouth of the Elkhom River (rm 33), a major tributary. <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />Location of Nesting Sites <br />During 13-24 June, we travelled by airboat from Lexington to the mouth of <br />the Platte locating nesting sites and marking individual nests. We located addi- <br />tional nests during foIlow-up visits to sites. We floated eggs to determine incu- <br />bation stage (Hays and LeCroy 1971 as modified by Schwalbach 1988) and <br />estimated the date of nest initiation by back-dating from the census date. We <br />marked nests with survey flags placed 1 m north of the nest and pushed into the <br />sand exposing 2 cm of roIled flag. Flags facilitated the relocation of nests later <br />in the season for a variety of habitat measurements. Data collection while birds <br />were present would have caused excessive disturbance. <br /> <br />Aerial Videography <br />We videotaped the Platte River from an aircraft on several dates to obtain <br />areal habitat measurements during the breeding season (Sidle and Ziewitz <br />1990). FoIlowing the nesting season, we determined that the period 25 April-24 <br />June had been the principal period of the birds' arrival and nest initiation. We <br />selected six video recordings over the Lower Platte and eight over the Central <br />Platte that represented the range of river discharges that occurred during this <br />period because several of the habitat characteristics of interest to us varied with <br />river discharge. We analyzed selected scenes from these recordings using image <br />processing tools on a micro-computer (Sidle and Ziewitz 1990). <br />We analyzed video scenes of 26 nesting sites to measure characteristics of <br />used sites and analyzed a systematic sample of sites to measure the same char- <br />acteristics of the riverine habitat available to least terns and piping plovers. We <br />established samplc sites every three miles beginning at rm 2, which yielded 34 <br />sites on the Lower Platte and 29 sites on the Central Platte. Three of the sites on <br />the Lower Platte occurred at approximately the same location as nest sites. <br />Therefore, the systematic sample of the Lower Platte was not entirely a sample <br />of unused sites, and we included data from these three sites in both data groups. <br />None of the Central Platte sample sites coincided with nest sites. <br />The object of analysis within each video scene was a 402-m (X-mile) seg- <br />ment of river. Within each segment, we measured the area of total channel, per- <br />manent vegetation, and potentiaIly suitable nesting substrate (sandbar area). <br />Such substrate appears white or light-colored on the video. Damp areas or areas <br />with greater than 20% vegetation cover appear darker and were not interpreted <br />as potentially suitable nesting substrate. We calculated average channel width as <br />the active channel area divided by the 402-m length of the segment. We defined <br />active channel as that portion of the river bed not stabilized by permanent <br /> <br />" <br />