Laserfiche WebLink
<br />UUU63~ <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />Prairie Naturalist 24(1): March 1992 <br /> <br />SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Our comparisons of sandbar area, channel width, mean elevation, and maxi- <br />mum elevation of nest sites versus systematic sample sites in the Lower <br />Platteand Central Platte study areas suggest that least terns and piping plovers <br />use wide channels with a large area of dry, sparsely vegetated sand. By these <br />two measures alone, habitat availability was considerably greater on the Lower <br />Platte than on the Central Platte. Although nest sites also had higher mean and <br />maximum elevation than systematic sample sites, these differences were not <br />statistically significant in either river reach. On the Lower Platte, nests were lo- <br />cated on significantly higher ground than the mean elevation of the nest sites. <br />On the Central Platte the mean elevation of nests was less than the mean site <br />elevation at half of the nest sites. <br />These differences between the nest and systematic sample sites and between <br />the Lower and Central Platte suggest that habitat availability is limited in the <br />river channel along the Central Platte. A greater number of least terns and pip- <br />ing plovers nest on sand pits than on the river along the Central Platte (Lingle <br />1988, 1989). This is consistent with our observation that riverine habitat is in <br />short supply. <br />Nests on the Central Platte were initiated at lower elevations above water <br />(x=0.39 m) than nests on the Lower Platte (x=0.49 m), despite the fact that 1988 <br />nesting season flows were much greater on the Lower Platte. However, these <br />means were not significantly different (t=1.53, p>O.l). <br />Low flows followed by sudden peaks in early and late July resulted in the <br />inundation of 8 of the 13 nests surveyed at Central Platte sites. The median ele- <br />vation of these nests equates to a stage of about 82.0 cms (2895 cfs) at the <br />Grand Island gage (Table 5). Rows higher than 82.0 cms during 16 June to 31 <br />August, the latter half of the nesting season, occurred in 18 of the 30 years from <br />1959 to 1988, suggesting that nest inundation is likely to be a common occur- <br />rence given present habitat conditions. <br />These facts coupled with the striking paucity of dry sandbar area in the <br />videography of the Central Platte, even at low flows, suggest that those <br />channels of the Central Platte wide enough to be attractive to terns and plovers <br />are too flat to provide safe nesting substrate. Higher portions of the river bed <br />that might have provided safe nesting substrate in the past have become <br />vegetated islands. <br /> <br />MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Recovery plans for the piping plover and interior population of the least tern <br />call for the maintenance of the distribution and range of both species, protection <br />of essential habitat, and the restoration of nesting habitat (USFWS 1988, <br />1990b). Essential habitat along the Platte River refers to sandbars in the river <br />channel. Given the degraded habitat conditions f9r these birds in the Central <br />Platte, channel habitat restoration is necessary." <br />Habitat restoration for least terns already has been accomplished elsewhere <br />in North America. It is the cornerstone of efforts for the recovery of the en- <br />