My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11044
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:49 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:41:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1978
Title
Evaluation of Cloud Seeding in Utah
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />N <br />~ <br /> <br />(.,.:-: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />S's\--. \VI 't-~ <br /> <br />EVALUATION OF CLOUD SEEDING IN UTAH <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Utah has had a cloud seeding program for six years with a snowpack <br /> <br />augmentation project operating during each of these years. A rain increase! <br /> <br />hail suppression project has operated during the past four summers. <br /> <br />Many attempts have been made to evaluate the progress of the winter <br /> <br />snowpack project, however because of a lack of data these evaluations were never <br /> <br />statistically significant. The results of an operational project are much more <br /> <br />difficult to determine than those of a research project. Operationally the <br /> <br />sponsor's objective is to increase the precipitation, the maximum amount possible, <br /> <br />thus all seedable storms are treated. On the other hand, the research objective <br />* <br />is knowledge; therefore, techniques such as randomization can be used to determine <br /> <br />the effects. <br /> <br />Earlier attempts at evaluation by the Division of Water Resources and North <br /> <br />American Weather Consultants (NAWC) were unsuccessful in showing statistical <br /> <br />significance because of a lack of data and also because the control areas which <br /> <br />had been chosen were too far from the target areas. This past winter NAWC looked <br /> <br />into the possibility of utilizing a control area in Western Utah much. closer to <br /> <br />the target area. A discussion of the selection of the control area follows under <br /> <br />a separate section. <br /> <br />After selection of a more representative control area, trial data runs <br /> <br />indicated that good relationships existed. NAWC then completed an evaluation <br /> <br />study and after review by the Division of Water Resources' Technical Advisory <br /> <br />Committee, the report was published. <br /> <br />The following sections labeled Approach, Selection of Control, and <br /> <br />Definition of Target Area are quoted directly from the NAWC report: <br /> <br />*Randomization is a procedure where some seedable storms are left unseeded for <br />comparison purposes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.