Laserfiche WebLink
<br />O"~2~0 <br />vv Q~ <br /> <br />Following acrimonious debate, the committee agreed that the very upper <br />reaches of the Poudre River, consisting of thirty-three miles, could be <br />given federal Wild and Scenic River designation, subject to protective <br />language for existing and planned water projects. Points of view regarding <br />the remaining fifty miles of river above the canyon mouth were hopelessly <br />at odds. <br /> <br />The Fort Collins City Council approved a resolution supporting <br />designation of the Poudre mainstem from its source to the mouth of the <br />canyon and the South Fork of the Poudre, with the exception of the Rockwell <br />Reservoir site. The Greeley City Council and the Weld County Commissioners <br />opposed any federal designation whatsoever. Citizens' groups were formed <br />to promote various pOints of view. <br /> <br />Following two months of disagreement, representatives of the Northern <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District and the City of Fort Collins announced <br />that a compromise might be possible. Mr. Brown appointed a subcommittee of <br />the Citizen's Advisory Group to hammer out a compromise solution. This <br />subcommittee consisted of Larry D. Simpson, Manager, Northern Colorado <br />Water Conservancy District; Chuck Carlson, Chairman, Weld County <br />Commissioners; Chuck Wanner, member, Preserve Our Poudre Group; and Gerry <br />Horak, Mayor Pro Tern, Fort Collins. <br /> <br />Through the subcommittee negotiations, a Bill was fashioned containing <br />protective language to exempt present water development from any affects by <br />a Wild and Scenic River designation. Approximately seventy miles of the <br />Poudre would have been designated Wild and Scenic. A number of future <br />projects would have been excluded from designation and permit review, so <br />long as reasonable fish flow bypasses were made by those projects. <br /> <br />However, after the Bill was introduced by Representative Brown, <br />national environmental groups opposed it and the Bill was not reported out <br />of committee. Opposition focused on the fact that the Cache la Poudre <br />wilderness area bordered on the Indian Meadows Reservoir site. The Sierra <br />Club, in particular, objected to exempting a reservoir site which touched a <br />wilderness,area. <br /> <br />H.R. 3547, A Consensus Bill <br /> <br />Arriving at a Poudre Wild and Scenic compromise between environmental <br />and water user interests has been a steady three-year process. The major <br />component of the compromise entails Wild and Scenic designation of the <br />poudre River as it runs through the Idylwilde and Indian Meadows Reservoir <br />sites, with the result that these sites will be excluded from future <br />development. <br /> <br />-4- <br />