My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11022
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP11022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:42 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:39:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.911
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - SE Needs Assessment and PSOP
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
12/10/1998
Author
GEI Consultants Inc
Title
SECWCD Arkansas Basin Future Water and Storage Needs Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />r., I" .") <br />Ol~'; <br /> <br />Water and Storage Needs Assessment <br />SECWCD/Assessment Enterprise <br />December 10, 1998 <br /> <br /> <br />.1 <br />~ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ii <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1. The District should focus its initial deliberations on the Lake Meredith Enlargement, <br />Fry-Ark Project Reoperation, Turquoise Lake Enlargement, Pueblo Reservoir <br />Enlargement, Gravel Lakes storage, and. non-structural alternatives. These <br />alternatives involve Project facilities or options that work conjunctively with Project <br />facilities. <br /> <br />2. Execute a Memorandum of Agreement with Colorado Springs to allow collaboration <br />and technical oversight by the District in their technical review/NEPA compliance <br />study. <br /> <br />3. Update and refine the existing Fry-Ark operations model to include storage of Winter <br />Water, "if-and-when" water, and East Slope Project water. <br /> <br />4. Continue discussions with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation relative to "reoperation" <br />and Project reservoir enlargements. <br /> <br />5. Hold meeting(s) with SSC to evaluate financing options. <br /> <br />6. Further evaluate the "Valley Pipeline" concept <br /> <br />7. Conduct follow-up information meetings with constituent groups. <br /> <br />8. Maintain the Storage Study Committee process. <br /> <br />9. Conduct system operations studies for various combinations of storage options. This <br />should include evaluation of operations scenarios that would enhance instream flows <br />and recreational opportunities. These studies also should consider potential water <br />quality impacts, particularly related to reoperation. <br /> <br />10. Conduct preliminary environmental studies to assess potential "fatal flaws." <br /> <br />11. Review identified non-structural water management options that could be integrated <br />into a preferred plan of water development <br /> <br />12. Undertake legal/institutional reviews relative to the identified storage/reoperations <br />alternatives. <br /> <br />Colorado Springs is proceeding with assessment of permitting issues associated with their <br />identified storage needs. In order to avoid duplication of efforts, we recommend that the District <br />and Colorado Springs work cooperatively. <br /> <br />-VI1- <br /> <br />~ GEl Consultants, Inc. <br /> <br />91411\fin:iU\TEXT-A WPD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.