Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C',J <br />to <br />~ <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />BUREAU OF RECLAMATION REPORT <br /> <br />Project \'forks <br /> <br />The project would consist of the Green River Canal, a few short <br />laterals, and a drainage 5,7stem. <br /> <br />The Green River Canal would head on the west side of the Green River <br />approxilnately 6 miles east of Big Piney, Wyo. Generally paralleling the <br />river, it would extend 7 miles to the project area and then would run 31.5 <br />miles along the upper edge of the project lands. The canal headworks with <br />a capacity of 175 second-feet would be placed so low in the river that it <br />would not be necessary to raise the water surface by a controlling weir. <br />The headworks structure would be of reinforced concrete with a l2-foot b.r <br />10-foot radial gate to regulate the flow of water into the canal. The <br />canal would consist mostly of earth section. It would include, however, <br />a short bench flume, a concrete chute and control section, clay-lined <br />sections with a total length of nearly 3~ miles, and 60-inch precast con- <br />crete pipe siphons with a total length of about 1/4 mile to cross North, <br />Middle, and South Piney Creeks. About 6,770 feet downstream from the <br />headworks, a fish screen and wasteway structure would be built to protect <br />fish life. This structure would return a constant flow of 10 second-feet <br />to the river to permit escape of fish and would pass 165 second-feet along <br />the canal for irrigation. The screens, of a revolving type, would be <br />powered by water wheels set in the canal below the screens. A Parshall <br />flume with a 10-foot throat width would be installed immediately below <br />the fish screens to measure the irrig'ltion water. About 13 timber bridges <br />of a standard Bureau design would be built to carry traffic over the canal. <br />About 43 culverts would be built to bypass surface drainage water. <br /> <br />Diversions would be made along the canal course through standard <br />reinforced concrete pipe turnouts. Only a few short laterals would be <br />required to reach lands that could not be served by direct turnouts. <br /> <br />A simple 5,7stem of drains would be constructed to protect low eleva- <br />tion project and adjacent nonproject lands from damage by seepage. An <br />extensive drainage 5,7stem would not be required because of the favorable <br />soil characteristics and topography. <br /> <br />Project Costs <br /> <br />Estimated construction costs of the various project features and <br />detailed engineering data on the features are summarized in the table <br />on the following p<3.ge. As shown by the table, the construction costs <br />are estimated at a total of $1,540,000 or $1,476,000 exclusive of non- <br />reimbursable money expended for project investigat ions and surveys from <br />the Colorado River Development Fund. The estimates are based on December <br />1949 prices and include allowances for engineering, overhead, contingencies, <br />and rights-of-way, <br /> <br />3 <br />