My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10998
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:39:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8135.300
Description
Ditch Companies - Catlin
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1975
Author
Richard Luckey USGS
Title
US Department of the Interior - Geological Survey - Hydrologic Effects of Reducing Irrigation to Maintain a Permanent Pool in the John Martin Reservoir - Arkansas River Valley - Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />.. . <br />.----~-- <br /> <br />0742 <br /> <br />The State has acquired sufficient shares in the Catlin Canal to <br /> <br />maintain a permanent pool under the above assumptions. During the 25- <br /> <br />year period, the average volume of the permanent pool is 10,900 acre- <br /> <br />feet (1.3XI07 m3). The initial volume of the pool is 10,000 acre-feet <br /> <br />7 3 <br />(1.2xlO m). <br /> <br />The change in water use increased the mean annual surface-water <br /> <br />diversion of 18 of the 21 canals in the area having surface-water rights. <br /> <br />The remaining three canals are not affected. The total increase in <br /> <br />6 3 <br />surface-water diversion is 1,770 acre-feet (2.2xlO m). Three canals <br /> <br />have small decreases in surface-'Water diversion during some months due <br /> <br />to the change in water use plan. This decrease primarily happened <br /> <br />during the early spring, but also occurred in the late summer. <br /> <br />The flow at the State line increased an average of 30 acre-feet <br /> <br />u 3 <br />(3.7xlO' m ) per month due to the change plan. This increase in flow is <br /> <br />accompanied by a slight increase in the variability of flow at the State <br /> <br />line. <br /> <br />The difference between ground-water storage change under normal <br /> <br />op~ration simulation and the simulation with the cllange in use is <br /> <br />insignifican t. <br /> <br />The overall benefit to the water users in the basin is due to <br /> <br />several factors. The most significant factor is a decrease in the <br /> <br />charge in evaporation losses from the nonpermanent pool in John ~lartin <br /> <br />Reservoir because of the permanent pool. A less significant factor is <br /> <br />the change in timing of return flows from water that had ,been histor- <br /> <br />ically applied, but was not transferred. The 2.5-percent river loss <br /> <br />charge also adds some water to the system. <br />24 <br /> <br />...1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.