Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001521t <br /> <br />volcanic rock overlain by a very thin soil mantle. The stock ponds are <br />characteristically shallow with a maximum depth of about 5 feet. Filling <br />occurs each spring from snowmelt, but prior to treatment the water o;;eeped <br />away in from 1 to 3 weeks. For treatment the pond floor was covered <br />with from 1/2 to 1 inch of impure bentonite secured from a quarry'about <br />50 miles distant. On wetting the clay expanded to a layer about 3 inches <br />thic.k. This practically eliminated seepage in the pond and the water <br />remained in storage until lost by evaporation and other causes. <br /> <br />,-..,....'", <br /> <br />The treatment used in this instance required from 75 to 125 cubic <br />yards of bentonite per ,acre of stock pond floor. It was obtained at a cost <br />of about $5 per cubic yard spread. Although expensive, the treatment is <br />justified On the basis of large benefits obtained. Occasional renewal of <br />the blanket is needed to compensate for the bentonite lost by wind during <br />the summer months when the stock pond is dry. Because of this loss dur- <br />ing dry periods, the bentonite treatment is most effective in ponds that <br />retain water yearlong. <br /> <br />_::;- ~~; . .~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The suggestionha.s beenadvanced that providing a compacted <br />layer of soil over the entire stock pond floor at the time of construction <br />would be beneficial in reducing seepage., Doubtless such treatment would <br />result in substantial saving of water in many localities, although data <br />based on actual measurements are not available. If written into the <br />specifications and included as a part of the construction contract s.o that <br />it could be carried out at the completion of construction when both water <br />trucks and heavy compacting equipment were at the site, the treatment <br />could be accomplished at a minimum of expense. Since stock ponds are <br />constructed to provide water for livestock for as long as possible, a,h <br />extra charge to reduce seepage losses may well be justified. <br /> <br /> <br />In cases of excessive seepage that cannot be corrected by the <br />methods described above, use of pla'stic.Jining or impervious pavement <br />may be justified. Plastic of the proper weight and toughness is now <br />available in large sheets which can be joined by cement to make a water- <br />proof lining extending across the stock pond floor. If covered with a <br />minimum of 6 inches of so il and protected from trampling by livestock, <br />the lining should last ,indefinitely. The treatment will be expensive but <br />probably will be less than is involved in abandonment of the reservoir <br />and construction of a new one or development of water by some other <br />means. Use of waterproof pavement for this same purpose may be <br />advantageous and the choice will depend on a number of economic and <br />engineering considerations which should be analyzed before the final <br />treatment is selected. <br /> <br />Several organic products, most of them petroleum derivatives, <br />are now being u sed to redu ce seepage in irrigation canals, and appear <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />",;- <br />