Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.r <br /> <br />Funding: The bill would authorize $170 million over five years for grants to <br />states: $40 million for each of the first two fiscal years following enacement, and <br />$30 million for each of the next three fiscal years. <br />Public Lands: No provision. <br /> <br />NATIONAL LAND POLICY. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT ACT <br /> <br />Sponsor: Rep. Wayne Aspinall (D-Colo.) and four others (H.R. 7211). <br />Current Status: Reported by Interior Committee to House in mid-1972, but no <br />floor action taken. The defeat or retirement of many Committee members, including <br />Chairman Aspinall, clouds the future of this bill until the Committee is organized, <br />but legislation covering public lands and state land use programs is likely to be <br />introduced in one or more bills. <br />General Approach: The bill would provide for development of land use plans for <br />all public lands, development of state planning procedures for non-public lands and <br />coordination among Federal agencies administering public lands and between those <br />agencies and non-Federal landowners and planners. <br />State Role: Similar to S. 632 above, except it would regulate new subdivisions <br />and developments to assure adequate planning for improvements and for prevention of <br />natural damage and would regulate location of and use of land surrounding new <br />communities. <br />Federal Role: The bill would establish an Office of Land Use Planning Adminis- <br />tration as in S. 632, with this additional authority: If a state has no approved <br />plan within three years after enactment, the Office may withhold grants under the <br />Non-Interstate Federal Highway Program, the Airport and Airway Development Act of <br />1970, and the Land and Water Conservation Act of 1965 at the rate of seven percent <br />the first year, 14 percent the second year and 21 percent thereafter. The Office <br />may redistribute the money to complying states. No certification of good-faith <br />efforts by states to implement the plan would be required. The Office would also <br />coordinate public land planning. An interdepartmental advisory board would be <br />established, as in S. 632. <br />Local Role: Same as in S. 632. <br />Funding: For fiscal year 1974, $54 million to cover up to 90 percent of the <br />costs of each state program; for FY 1975 and 1976, $45 million each year and 75 <br />percent cost-sharing limit; for FY 1977 and 1978, $30 million each year, 50 percent <br />cost-sharing limit. <br />Public Lands: The bill would require: <br />General retention in Federal ownership unless disposal would achieve greater <br />benefit for the general public; an inventory of all public lands to determine the <br />type of land use providing maximum benefit for the general public; development of <br />land use plans for all public land, with full consideration of environmental quality, <br />present and potential users, alternative methods and regional economic growth; a <br />review of past executive withdrawals and congressional review of future withdrawals <br />in excess of 25,000 acres; disposal only of lands that are isolated and difficult <br />to manage, acquired and no longer necessary for a specific use, or best suited for <br />use or production of resources under non-Federal ownership; public participation <br />in the formation of agency regulations; management on the basis of multiple use and <br />sustained yield, including recognition that some land will be used for less than all <br />of the resources and not necessarily including the combination of uses that will <br />give the greatest dollar return or the greatest unit output. <br />The bill would also require protection of scenic, recreational, ecological and <br />historic values and preservation of some lands in natural condition; payment of fair <br /> <br />8 <br />