My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10974
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10974
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:38:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.143.J
Description
Smith Fork (Crawford) Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
5/1/1958
Author
Dept of Agriculture
Title
Report of Reappraisal of Direct Agricultural Benefits and Project Impacts-Smith Fork Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />N <br />00 <br />c: <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />Relationship of the Smi th Fork Project to National Forest Lands <br /> <br />The Smith Fork project will not impair any existing facility or service <br />on nati onal forest lands. <br /> <br />Relationship of Watershed Conditions to the Smith Fork Project <br /> <br />Watershed conditions affecting this project are those common to most <br />western irrigation projects. Th~ do not materially affect feasibility <br />of the porject. However, improvement of watershed conditions will extend <br />the life of the project and reduce operating difficulties and maintenance <br />expenses. <br /> <br />The watershed area that affects the Smi th Fork project includes the drainage s <br />of the 9ni th Fork River, Allen Gulch and Cottonwood Creek. Upper lands <br />generally have fai r to good vege tati ve cover while lower lying lands have <br />fair to poor plant cover conditions. Erosion and sediment production is <br />greater on the lower lands. Land ownership is 55 percent private and 45 <br />percent federal. The Gould Reservoir on Iron Creek, about 4 miles above <br />the proposed Crawford Reservoir site, tends to decrease flood peaks and <br />sediment damage on the Iron Creek drainage. Watershed condi tions do not <br />pose a flood threat to the project, but do permit excessive amounts of <br />sediment to be produced. Bureau of Reclamation plans for the proposed <br />Crawford Reservoir provide for storage of the anticipated sediment. The <br />appli cation of land treatment measures and improved range management should <br />be undertaken on problem areas where erosion is active. This will reduce <br />the amount of sediment produced and prolong the useful life of the reservoir <br />and the project. This treatment can be done under authori ty of regular <br />programs. The construction of large flood control structures is not <br />re commended. <br /> <br />iv <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.