Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br /> <br />-,- <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />-, <br /> <br />Table 9.- Projected cropping pattern, 'with' and 'without' project, by <br />evaluation areas, Smith Fork project <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />Wi thout project <br /> <br />Wi th project <br /> <br />Crop <br />Evaluation : A : <br />areas <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />: <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />B : C <br /> <br />E :Total <br /> <br />: D : E :Total: A <br />. . 0 0 <br />. . 0 0 <br /> <br />: <br />B <br /> <br />: C <br />o <br />. <br /> <br />: D : <br />. : <br /> <br />: <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />Alfalfa <br /> <br />Grass hay <br /> <br />Rotation <br />pasture <br /> <br />Com silage <br /> <br />Barley <br /> <br />- - - - - - - - Acres <br /> <br />488 531 543 - 170 1,732 329 3'94 468 68 107 1,366 <br />168 191 543 - 65 967 180 223 461 64 65 993 <br /> <br />320 389 621 - 144 1,474 533 679 1,001 214 207 2,634 <br />135 230 160 - 52 577 144 268 181 32 52 677 <br />472 460 640 - 183 1,755 503 536 724130183 2,076 <br /> <br />Nonirrigated 112 318 350 540 - 1,320 <br /> <br />Farmstead <br />Total <br /> <br />Permanent <br />pasture <br /> <br />101 <br />1,796 <br /> <br />115 160 - 39 415 107 134 182 32 39 494 <br />2,2343,017540653 8,240 1,796 2,2343,017 540 653 8,240 <br /> <br />533 578 822 144 79 2,156 533 578 822 144 79 2,156 <br /> <br />Returns to Operator and Family Labor and Management <br /> <br />An appraisal of the adequacy of projected farm incomes requires a guide or <br />standard in terms of return to operator and family management and labor. <br />For purposes of this report, a return of $3,100 is used as a minimum average <br />for full-time farms.]j Variations from this amount would be expected with <br />different managerial requirements, quantities of operator and family labor <br />and, in established farming areas, the willingness of farm families to <br />accept lower returns rather than move to alternative employment. <br /> <br />]j Fuhriman, W.U., Blanch, G.T., and Stewart, C.E. An Economic Analysis <br />of the Agricultural Potentials of the Weber Basin Reclamation Project, <br />Utah. Utah Agricul tural Experiment Station Special. Report No.7, <br />December 1952. <br />U. S. Department of Agriculture and U. S. Department of Commerce, <br />Farmers Expenditures, a special cooperative survey, December 1956. <br /> <br />- 27 - <br />