Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />- <br />~. <br />- <br /> <br />\.: <br /> <br />Fanners now overirrig;l.te; during the early months of the irrigation season <br />when surplus water is available, in an effort to minimize, as much as <br />possible, the effects of the late-season difficiencies. Distribution of <br />water in accordance with crop needs will enable farmers to reduce or <br />eliminate this excessive spring irrigation. The result will be increased <br />crop yields with li tUe more total stream depletion than at present. <br /> <br />During years of critically low runoff, excess spring snowmelt has escaped <br />downstream but after project construction this excess water will be stored <br />in the reservoir. Storage will result in a substantial increase in the <br />available supply for the project for those years. The resulting water <br />supply in such years will be approximately equal to that which has existed <br />in the average or better than average years without the project. <br /> <br />The planned capaci ty of Crawford Reservo ir is only sli ghtly in excess of <br />the average project requirements for late-season water. For the normal <br />range of operating condi tions, the carty-over wi 11 vary from nothing to <br />about 4,000 acre feet. <br /> <br />A project operations study has been made by the Bureau of Reclamation. <br />Review of this study shows that under project operations, with condi tions <br />of weather and runoff similar to those of the study period of 1942 to 1956 <br />(including the lowest runoff in the history of the project area), only three <br />years out of 15 would have a less than adequate water supply. Runoff records <br />for the .9ni th Fork Ri ver are of short duration. Comparing these records <br />with nearby longer period records indicates that, if the project had operated <br />during the 58-year period of 1904 to 1957, there would have been only six <br />years wi th water supplies so short as to adversely affect the project. <br /> <br />Since the reservoi r capacity is limited to annual storage and will not <br />provide regulation of runoff from one year to another, it will be important <br />that farm operators wi thin the project have avai 1able each year some fore- <br />cast of the prospective supplies. Such water supply forecasts are usually <br />available from the Soil Conservation Service Snow Survey and Water Supply <br />Forecast program. They make it possible for the farmer to adjust his <br />operations to fit the prospective water supply, thus minimizing the economic <br />effects of a defficient supply. <br /> <br />There are no snow courses on the Smi th Fork watershed at present. I t would <br />appear that in order to provide an adequate basis for estimating snow cover <br />and forecasting water supplies, existing networks should be extended to <br />provide two or three snow courses on the watershed, wi th corresponding soil <br />moisture measuring stations. <br /> <br />Findings <br /> <br />Based on a weighted average seasonal consumptive use of 18.7 inches per <br />acre and an estimated on-farm irrigation efficiency of 42 percent, the <br />estimated farm irrigation requirement per irrigated acre is 44.4 inches of <br />water. Proposed project facilities will deliver an average of 42.6 inches <br />of irrigation water at the fann headgate, thus meeting 96 percent of the <br />average requirements of the project lands. <br /> <br />- 16 - <br />