Laserfiche WebLink
<br />!,a7h~7a~7 <br />- . '-' <br /> <br />77, <br />01vJ <br /> <br />~e.. <br />~ <br />,n~ \:..0 <br />{'\{J-' '" <br />. c' ' "C <br />k,D' J ,.X, <br />,)c p <br />~' I ~ <br />, \/ . <br />~€ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />c. Water Forms, Streams - Drainage liith numerous or llnusual <br /> <br />~hanging flow characteristics, falls, rapids, pools and <br /> <br />meanders or \-lith large volu.i'1e. <br /> <br />2. form - Form or massiveness is~ro~ 'Z <br /> <br />3. eolor - Colors dominate or are distinctive. They have bright- <br /> <br />ness, variety, and interaction, <br /> <br />4. Line - Lines complement the landscape. <br /> <br />5, Texture - Textures vary and form patterns. ehanging vegatative <br /> <br />communities in relation to geology is an example, <br /> <br />6. Other. Senses - Sounds, sights and smells found along the river <br /> <br />are not experienced on other rivers in the area. <br /> <br />The river is different or distinguishable from rivers that <br />-7' <br />flow through similar terrain and vegetative zones, <br /> <br />The visual management system will be used as the tool for determining <br /> <br />the scenic eligibility of the Elk River and its Forks, The Elk River <br /> <br />system has been visually mapped to determine if the criteria above <br /> <br />can be met, Visual quality objectives were determined as seen <br /> <br />from Forest Development Road No. 400 along the Elk River and <br /> <br />Middle Fork, Road No, 431 adjacent to the North Fork, and Road <br /> <br />No, 443 along the South Fork. Where the river deviates from the <br /> <br />road alignment consideration \'@2' given to _thp ~n"lYsis. by walking <br /> <br />the system, Visual quality objecti':es were not generally extended <br /> <br />beyond the visual boundaries because of the criteria developed <br /> <br />for the study, (Approx. 1" mile on each side of the River), <br />