Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2" <br /> <br /> <br />OfJ2253 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2,800,000 acre-feet, would be built on the main Trinity River <br />downstream from Lewiston Dam. This reservoir would develop an <br />annual new water yield of 600,000 acre-feet which would be <br />diverted to the Sacramento River. Subsequently, Eltapom Reservoir, <br />with a gross storage capacity of 3,100,000 acre-feet, would be <br />constructed on the South Fork of Thinity River. This reservoir <br />also would develop an annual yield of 600,000 acre-feet which <br />would be diverted to Helena Reservoir with subsequent diversion <br />to Sacramento River. Power generating facilities would be incor- <br />porated with these proposed developments. Estimated capital <br />costs of these reservoirs and associated facilities, as estima- <br />ted by the State of California, are $540,000,000. Annual OM&R <br />costs would be offset by power revenues with a net annual amount <br />remaining of about $12,300;000. <br /> <br />The estimated total capital cost (reconnaissance) for this <br />prospective plan, including tunnel conveyance to Lake Havasu on <br />Colorado River, exchange conveyance facilities, and storage reser- <br />voir systems is $1,690,000,000. The annual OM&R and pumping costs <br />are offset by power generated, with an estmmated annual revenue <br />remaining of $11,000,000. <br /> <br />Under this proposal, therefore, the additional 1,200,000 acre- <br />feet of water would be stored and conveyed to southern California <br />at an estimated annual equivalent cost of $55 per acre-foot, includ- <br />ing interest at 3 percent and amortization of the facilities in <br />50 years. <br /> <br />The average annual acre-foot cost given is computed by using <br />only the incremental costs of enlargement of conveyance facilities. <br />Appropriate allocation of costs between the East Side Division <br />faci lities and the proposed incremental enlargement under this plan <br />may reflect some increase in this acre-foot value. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This plan contemplates diversion of water from several east <br />side San Joaquin Valley streams by relatively high elevation tunnels. <br />Since this water is now being used downstream, exchange facilities <br />and water supplies will be required. Approval of these exchanges <br />will require negotiations with the downstream water users. Such <br />negotiations could be both lengthy and complex. <br /> <br />The reservoir storage systems and related diversions to <br />Sacramento River proposed under this plan should be authorized for <br />construction and operation by the Bureau of Reclamation as part of <br />th~ Pacific Southwest Water Plan, even though they will be inte- <br />grated closely with existing and proposed features of the Federal <br />Crntral Valley Project. <br />