My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10952
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10952
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:23 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:37:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.30.B
Description
UCRBRIP Instream Flows
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1990
Author
UCRBRIP
Title
Protection of Instream Flows for Endangered Colorado River Fishes in Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />draft of these recommendations, agreed that the FWS used the <br />best data presently available, but although it had some <br />concerns, the Board was prepared to use the interim <br />recommendations if proposed acquisitions were less than the <br />interim flows. Further studies are planned to refine or <br />.corroborate these flows. <br /> <br />C. Protecting instream flows on the Yampa River. <br /> <br />1. The Colorado Department of Natural Resources has been <br />discussing the acquisition of the Juniper/Cross Mountain <br />water rights with Colorado River Water Conservation <br />District (River District) and affected communities for <br />several years. It has also been determined that these <br />projects hold the controlling water rights on the Yampa <br />River. These entities agreed that they needed to <br />determine if there is a feasible alternative project that <br />could be constructed and operated in accord with water <br />development and other economic goals that would be <br />consistent with the recovery of endangered species. A <br />2-year study is underway to answer these questions and is <br />due to be completed late in 1991. The end product is to <br />be an "appraisal level feasibility study" of alternative <br />sites, future development plans and identification of uses <br />for the water rights, including instream flows. <br /> <br />2. The River District and Pittsburgh and Midway Coal <br />Mining Company have indicated a willingness to sell, <br />trade, or donate some of their water rights on the Little <br />Snake River. The Little Snake River, the major tributary <br />of the Yampa, supplies most of the sediment which is <br />important for backwater areas on the Green River in Utah <br />which are essential to young fish. The Department of the <br />Interior and the Wyoming Water Development Commission have <br />entered into a cooperative agreement for Wyoming to <br />utilize its model of the Little Snake River to evaluate <br />these water rights. The results of this study are due <br />this summer. <br /> <br />3. The Nature Conservancy, the FWS, and the Bureau of <br />Land Management (BLM) are working cooperatively to acquire <br />a large ranch on the Yampa and Little Snake Rivers which <br />would include 3,700 acre-feet of senior water rights on <br />the Yampa River. After an expression of interest by the <br />Implementation Committee, the Nature Conservancy agreed to <br />proceed with an appraisal of the property and will seek to <br />obtain an option once the appraisal is completed. The BLM <br />believes that this area will benefit it when added to its <br />current land holdings in the Cross Mountain area; and the <br />FWS believes that the flows, if converted to instream flow <br />water rights, will benefit its flow acquisition program. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.