Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />and Englewood). Lakewood had a shortage one year because of <br /> <br /> <br />insufficient storage space. <br /> <br /> <br />Five agencies (state, Indian Hills, Genesee, Morrison and <br /> <br /> <br />Lakewood) used bookover space five or more of the years in the <br /> <br /> <br />study. The bookover space used by these five agencies was from <br /> <br /> <br />48 percent to 200 percent over their normal storage space. (see <br /> <br /> <br />Table 8.) <br /> <br />2.2.10 Bookover Overall Results and Comparisons <br /> <br />When making an overall comparison of the with-bookover and <br />the without-bookover, there is one major factor which tends to <br />distort some of the results. In Scenarios A, Band C without <br />bookover, the state's account was treated as the sole bookover <br /> <br />account. with no reserved space of its own and continuous re- <br /> <br />lease requirements in excess of available space, the state's <br /> <br /> <br />water was rapidly being used and then not necessarily replaced in <br /> <br /> <br />a timely manner. In the same scenarios with bookover, the state <br /> <br /> <br />was subordinate to all other accounts that may have water in <br /> <br /> <br />excess of their own storage allotment. These accounts filled the <br /> <br /> <br />bookover space but did not use any more water meeting their <br /> <br /> <br />release requirements than in the without-bookover scenario. This <br /> <br /> <br />resulted in larger volume accounts for them and less space in <br /> <br /> <br />which the state could store its water for replacement uses. As a <br /> <br /> <br />result, the state spilled more water in the with-bookover than in <br /> <br /> <br />the without-bookover Scenarios A, Band C. <br /> <br />2-31 <br />