My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10938
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10938
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:21 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:36:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.900
Description
Bear Creek
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
1/1/1991
Author
Batchley Assoc.
Title
Bear Creek Operational Study - Vol. 1 - Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2.1.9 Scenario D (Without Bookover) Results <br /> <br /> <br />With the addition of the 2000 acre-feet storage space, the <br /> <br /> <br />State account improved and left the others relatively unchanged <br /> <br /> <br />except for the reservoir levels. (See Figure 5.) The pool never <br /> <br /> <br />reached its maximum level of 5585 feet. Three times (1949, 1952 <br /> <br /> <br />and 1957) the level was between Elevations 5580 and 5582. In <br /> <br /> <br />1957 it also reached its minimum level (excluding the start up) <br /> <br /> <br />of Elevation 5560. This resulted in a total fluctuation of <br /> <br /> <br />nearly 20 feet compared to a maximum permissible 27 feet. <br /> <br /> <br />There continued to be four agencies which satisfied their <br /> <br /> <br />requirements of water releases while Lakewood and the State <br /> <br /> <br />continue to need more storage space to hold the yield of their <br /> <br /> <br />water rights. (See Table 4.) The state's deficiency was reduced <br /> <br /> <br />70 percent over Scenario C. Mt. Carbon and Englewood continue to <br /> <br /> <br />be short for a lack of water available to store. Five agencies <br /> <br /> <br />continue to spill excess water. <br /> <br /> <br />Five agencies used 90 percent or more space for five or more <br /> <br /> <br />years, while a sixth one (State) used 88 percent or more for five <br /> <br /> <br />years. <br /> <br />2.2.1 <br />1. <br /> <br />2.2 Scenario A Through D with Bookover <br /> <br /> <br />Common criteria and Assumptions <br /> <br /> <br />If vacant space below the maximum level is available, <br /> <br /> <br />inflow from each entity's water rights will first be stored <br /> <br /> <br />in its account(s) up to its maximum allocable content. Any <br /> <br /> <br />additional water may be stored in unused space in other <br /> <br /> <br />accounts using the guidelines in Paragraph 1.2.6. <br /> <br />2-14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.