Laserfiche WebLink
<br />...... <br />.'. .", <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />.:~<f.l <br /> <br />functions of the projeot. It is the transitional step leading from <br />the economic evaluation of the project to the design of its reim- <br />bursement or cost sharing schedules. <br /> <br />prelimin~ry exploration in the field of reimbursement re- <br />vealed that before objeotive study of the problems and development <br />of application prooedures oould be aooomplished, major deoisions of <br />a policy nature would have to be made at higher levels of delibera- <br />tion. One of these deoisions would determine the latitude of the <br />AWRBIAC in reoommending ohanges in existing polioies or suggesting <br />new polioies where none now exist. Awaiting suoh deoisions, it <br />appeared that the urgenoy to oontinue. study of reimbursement methods <br />for A'~ applioation had diminished. Consequently no reoommendations <br />with respeot to reimburssment polioies or methods appear in this <br />report. <br /> <br />METHOD UNDER STUDY <br /> <br />The method of cost allooation under review is known as <br />the Separable Costs-Remaining Benefits method. It. presupposes that <br />thel'e will be available for its applioation the be.sio data developed <br />du~ing the project formulation and evaluation studies. Tho method <br />is designed for simultaneous applioation to both the investment costs <br />and the operation, maintenanoe, and replaoement costs of a project. <br /> <br />It is stated in the Green Book that equitable distribution <br />of project costs among the purposes served is attainod by providing <br />for proportional sharing of the savings due to including the func- <br />tion in a multiple-purpose project. Actually, however, only the <br />joint costs, or unassignable oosts, reoeive the proportioning treat- <br />ment. The method prohibits the cost allocated to any purpose from <br />exoeeding the oorresponding benefits and prohibits the allocated oost <br />from failing the oorresponding separable oosts. <br /> <br /> <br />The method regards, first, the determination of the separ- <br />able cost of inoluding each function in the multiple-purpose projeot. <br />The separable oost of each project function is defined as the differ- <br />ence in cost between the multiple-purpose project which includes the <br />particular funotion and the projeot oost with that funotion omitted. <br />This oost difference should include oonsideration of necessary modi- <br />fications of design and operation. <br /> <br />The method regards, seoondly, the determination of an <br />equitable distribution of joint oosts incurred for several purposes <br />in common. Joint costs are defined as the differenoe between the <br />cost of a multiple-purpose project as a whole and the sum of the <br />separable oosts for all projeot purposes. It is stated that the <br />distribution of joint oosts in proportion to the excess of benefits <br />over separable costs assigns to eaoh purpose an equitable share of <br />project savings. The amount of the benefit thus used as a basis <br /> <br />-2- <br />