Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C1 <br />- <br />to <br />C'J <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />52 <br /> <br />would be even. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />PRESIDING OPJ'ICERe I mJ.qht -- my friend. tzoOlll <br /> <br />the Bureau CAn atop me -- aince I'm from Phoenix I have. <br /> <br />l1ttle bit of ltnowled'lle abou.t CAP and lXIAy1le that IllAkea Ille <br /> <br />dangerous, but as I understand the Central ArtloDa Project <br /> <br />we're only talkinq about the maximum diveraion of a flow of <br /> <br />Gome two thousand (2,000) or twenty-five hundred (2,500) <br /> <br />cuhle-foot-per-aeoond which i. minor compared to the flow in <br /> <br />a river. <br /> <br />!om. MCKEE I Well, v. were led to beU.ve <br /> <br />that there would never be enouqh v.ter in exe.... Dutvhat <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I'm tryinq to drive at, will it be .at. .fter the Arizona <br /> <br />Projeot ia complete? <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />MR. MASONe Do you recall the qraph that <br /> <br />showed an increase in storage? <br /> <br />.I <br /> <br />.1R. MCKEEs Right. <br /> <br />HR. MASOlls That waa predicated becau.. our <br /> <br />normal water yield 18 about two and a half (2.5) million <br /> <br />acre-feet more than our us.. libat CAP wl11 do lt will <br /> <br />increase the depletion, so Inatead of 901n'll up, CAP will <br /> <br />cause that graph to flatt8n out 8omewha~. Also, ~h.r. are <br /> <br />development. in the Upper Colorado sta~os and at ~hat tiMe <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />we undoubtedly wl11 have more storage in our reservoirs <br /> <br />when those depletions take place. <br /> <br />MR. MeXER. I don't have an engineering <br />