Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-. <br /> <br />00'2371 <br /> <br />f1~;~j <br /> <br />?;~e~" <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />-Ii <br /> <br />, *' <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />The- Soviets have undertaken a complete re'Constt"clction job, and by 1965 plan <br />to have a waterway with capacity equal to the Stalin Canal and the Volga-Don. <br />When it is finished, the Soviets will have an Inland waterway system linking the <br />Black, the Caspian, the Baltic, and the Arctic, and capable of carrying smaller <br />types .of sea-g.oing vessels, including submarines. . <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />After naming several navigation pr.ojects now under constructi.on., Gen. Itsclmer <br />'safd, "These are only a few .of the main projects. They atone, when completed, will <br />provide approximately double the mileage of 9-foot or better waterway than we have <br />in the' United States." <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />IRRIGATION' <br /> <br />When it comes to irrigation, Soviet 'Claims are more vague and less well <br />substantiated than for power or inland water transport. For instance, the Soviets <br />claim to have nearly trebled the area under irrigation in the USSR, but they <br />provide no detailed information on where and whe~ this irrigation took place. <br />, ,Furthermore, it is quite difficult to interpret the Soviet frrig'ation statistics. <br /> <br />I have a table--Table VI--which duplicates material fOund 'in the December 20 <br />report to. the Interior and Insular Affairs Connnittee already referred to, but <br />expresses it in acres rather than hectares'. These data are in 'Ctose accord with <br />figures on the same subject available to Army Engineer Intelligence, The table <br />shows Soviet irrigated. acreages for selected years from 1913 -t'o- 1956. <br /> <br />D1.\ring the period 19'51 to 1955, inclusive, the area under irrigation' in the <br />USSR appears to have increased by about 6,000,000 a'Cres, or-24.S percent; This- <br />compares with an increase in the United States during the same period of aoout <br />5,500,000 acres, or 21.6 percent. Much of the U. S. increase consists of sprinkler <br />or' other methods in areas outside the 17 western states. . <br /> <br />However, we' may expect the'rate of increase in the USSR to accelerate <br />considerably, fot" it is their practice to bring the irrigation pat-tions of <br />multiple-purpose projects along more slowly than other functions, and consequently <br />the land reclamation benefits of some of their big undertakings are probably only <br />now beginning to appear. <br /> <br />Some Soviet irrigation developments far outstrip the biggest American projects, <br />at least as far as claimed acreage is concerned. One will provide water for 3% <br />million acres; another, for 4% million; another, for almost 5 million; another, <br />for almost 5% million, and one in the South Ukraine is expected to make possible <br />the irrigation of 8% million acres. The biggest American projects cover about <br />a million acres. However, there is a question as to whether the acreage figures <br />provide an accurate comparison as to the amount of water made available. <br /> <br />The Soviets lay much stress on what we would call supplemental irrigation-- <br />that is, prajects which provide only sufficient water to prevent crop failures in <br />years of subnormal rainfall, and for supplementary watering in normal years. Many <br />such marginal sub-humid areas are in the Caucasus Mountains and the sauthern part <br />of European USSR. In truly arid parts of the country, chiefly in Soviet Central <br />Asia, most of the effort has been devoted to extending and intensifying cultivation <br />in previously developed irrigated areas. <br />