My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10900
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10900
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:10 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:35:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.200
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Development and History - UCRB 13a Assessment
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/13/1979
Title
Draft Executive Summary - The Economic Impact of Synfuels Development on the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />/ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />o <br />C)1 <br />-..J <br />w::.. <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />This report describes the methodology and results of research aimed at <br /> <br />projecting the economic impact of emerging energy technology (EET) development <br /> <br />in the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB, see Fig. S-l). A computer model which <br /> <br />captures the direct, indirect and induced dependencies of the Basin economy in <br /> <br />economic equilibrium was employed for this task. This model, the UCRB Optimi- <br /> <br />zation Model, was run under economic conditions estimates to have prevailed in <br /> <br />1975 and conditions projected for 2000 without synfuel development. This pro- <br /> <br />vided a picture of how the UCRB economy looks today and how it might look in <br /> <br />, 2000 if there were no EET or synfuel development. <br /> <br />Two synfuel development scenarios were then assumed for the year 2000. <br /> <br />These scenarios, referred to as the "baseline" and "accelerated" synfuel sce- <br /> <br />narios, call for the UCRB to produce oil from shale and high and low Btu gas <br /> <br />from coal. By adding this synfuel activity to the original model inputs for <br /> <br />2000 and running the model, one obtains a projection of what the UCRB economy <br /> <br />would look like if the synfuel scenarios were actually fulfilled. The differ- <br /> <br />ences among these model results and the earlier model runs without synfuel <br /> <br />development provide a basis for calculating the absolute and relative changes <br /> <br />in the economy which would be due to synfuels development. <br /> <br />~egate Impacts <br /> <br />The measure of economic activity used to measure the aggregate economic <br /> <br />impact was personal income. The effect of non-synfuels development on Basin <br /> <br />'... <br />personal income is presented in Fig. 8-2. It shows that the model projects a <br /> <br />164% increase in Basin personal income over the period 1975-2000 even in the <br /> <br />absence of synfuels development: from 1.4 to 3.6 billion dollars. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.