My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10880
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10880
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:35:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8507
Description
Rio Grande Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Date
8/1/1964
Title
Reconnaissance Report Rio Grande Water Salvage Project Colorado - New Mexico Colorado Division
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Table 10. AnmlaJ. project costs <br /> <br />Economic capital costs ($6.180.000) <br />Project QI&R costs <br /> <br />Total amlual economic cost <br /> <br />$202.500 <br />1.38.000 <br /> <br />, $340.500 <br />://3,'1'/4:(1, <br /> <br />Benefit-Cost COII1par::l.soa <br /> <br />The :ratios of evalllated 8.l:mUal benefits to Blmual project <br />costs for the l00-y-ear per::l.oo'.are der::l.ved in Table 12. <br /> <br />Table ll. Benefit-cost :ratios <br /> <br />Evalllated &mlual 'benefits <br />Annual economic 'costs <br />Benefit-cost ratio <br /> <br />~ry <br /> <br />$1,428,100 <br />340,500 <br />4.19 <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />$2.340.400 <br />340.500 <br />6.87 <br /> <br />Cost Allocation <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Water salvage is the only purpose served to which project <br />costs can be allocated. Therefore, the entire project const,:ructicm <br />cost 8.m.ountil!lg to $6,270.000 and an anJIlual ilmount Qf $138.000 for <br />OperatiOll. ma.1nteunce and replacement eQsts are allocated to this <br />purpose . <br /> <br />Repayment Requiremeuts <br /> <br />It is cOlI.sidered that costs allocated to vater salvage for <br />constructionJ'- and operation, maintenance. 'and replacement of vater' <br />salvage features should be aom:eiJlibursabla. shce the iJP.d1vidual <br />be-nefic1ar::l.es Cl8.D:aOt be reaSeaably'identified. It is also recogaized <br />~t ,the proposed delivery of salvaged water to the Rio Gl~ to <br />i!aprc)olfe Colorado! s "debit, cond:l:tion UD.der the Rio Grande Compact would <br />beat benefit to all Rio G:raade Compact states and to the lfatioll.. <br /> <br />As discussed iD. the eJ.osed llasin Division Report. San Luis <br />Valle,- Project, Colorado. it would require a peried of at least 35 ,-ears <br />for 'Colorado to achieve a debit-free status. , Followil!lg this per::l.od a <br />continued alllimal delivery of 58,400 acre-feet o,f salvaged vater based <br />on CurreJlt data, would be required to maiataia Colo:rado in a debit-free <br /> <br />f'~ <br />i.... '- <br /> <br />",.~ ,'.. <br />..;,,'u .I. <br /> <br />Rev. 10"'729-64 <br /> <br />42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.