Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ECON<liIIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Annual Project :Benefits <br /> <br />Water Salvage <br /> <br />All waters to be salvaged can be beneficially used as described <br />under the section heading, "Need for Water Salvage. " Water salvaged from <br />this project can be used in conjunction with water salvaged from the <br />Closed 13asin Division, San Luis Valley Project, Colorado, as a credit <br />to Colorado to achieve debit-free status under the Rio G:ra.nde Compact. <br /> <br />In the vicinity of the Mosca-Sargent area, a potential use <br />exists for an estimated 11,500 acre-feet of salvage water for supplemental <br />"irrigation. However, before this area can be included as part of the <br />project plan, studies will have to be undertaken to determine the feasi- <br />bility of furnishing a supplemental water supply to these lands. 1'he <br />land is generally deSignated Class 5 due to drl'tinage problems, and is <br />recognized as a marginal irrigated area. Although these problems <br />exist, it is believed further studies will indicate the lands can be <br />succussf'ully irrigated if drainage facilities a.re provided. <br /> <br />Thus, for the purpose of this reconnaissance report, it is <br />assumed that all water salvaged would be used to reduce Colo:ra.do's debit <br />si tuationunder the Rio G:ra.nde Compact. During the prepa:ra.tion of feasi- <br />bility g:ra.de studies, full consideration will' be given to irrig!l.tion <br />potentials of lands adjacent to the Mosca'-Sargent area. <br /> <br />:Benefits from water salvage are based on the sameanalyBis as <br />presented in the feasibility report on the Closed 13asin Division, which <br />assumes that the minimum measure. of water salvage benefits would be the <br />value of water for irrigation use in the Rio Grande 13asin. <br /> <br />Analyses of water use and crop returns on the Rio Grande Proj- <br />ect in Texas and New Mexico, Middle ,Rio Grande Project in New MeXico, <br />and San Luis Valley Project in Colorado established that the net fam <br />income per acre-foot of water delivered to the San Luis Valley Project <br />would be less than the comparable values for ,the New Mexico and Texas <br />projects,primarily because of the shorter growing season which prevailS <br />in the San Luis Valley. It was therefore concluded that benefits based <br />on use of the Salvaged waters on the Rio Grande Division lands of the San <br />Luis Valley :E'roject would furnish a conservative minimal appraisal of the <br />water salvage benefits assignable to the plan of develo:pnent. <br /> <br />Fam income and costs ,for the Rio Grande Division lands were <br />estimated on the basis of 6 fam budgets which evaluate the effects <br />of land sizes and classes and agricultural enterprises prevailing in <br />the Rio Grande Division. On the basis of these bUdgets, the average <br />annual benefit assignable to the 224,340 acres oI'existing irrigation <br />in the Rio Grande Division with a full water supply was, estimated to be <br />$59 per acre. 1'he diversion requirement to furnish a full water supply <br /> <br />38 <br /> <br />, ' <br /> <br />('. '"". <br />I' \.''- <br /> <br />.. '""\ <br />r . U' <br />.:,;0 <br />