My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10867
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:34:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1962
Author
IBWC
Title
Mexican Water Treaty -Appendix E -Water Supply
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />"The second maj or point was that with the construction of Boulder <br />Dam and the All-American Canal (I) conditions during the past several <br />years have shown the dependence of Mexico upon facilities in the <br />UnHed States for a dependabie water supply; (2) without this treaty <br />Mexico could not solely by the use of her own facilities put to successful <br />use any larger, dependabie quantity of Colorado River Water, certainly <br />not more than 750,000 acre-feet. <br />"The third major point is that Mexico is the one requiring a treaty <br />on the Colorado River, not the United States. <br />* * * <br /> <br />Mr. Dowd also cautioned against allocating all of the water in the river and <br /> <br />predicted that there would be operational losses in delivering to Mexico l, 500,000 <br /> <br />acre-feet. He used a figure of 200,000 or 250,000 acre-feet for operational waste <br /> <br />or regulation losses. (see p. 732) <br /> <br />Senator Downey on page 739 introduces an interpretation of Article 10 of the <br /> <br />Treaty which would guarantee Mexico 1 .5 million acre-feet per year and permit her <br /> <br />to increase her allottment by an additional 1 .5 million acre-feet annually. Senator <br /> <br />Downey does this by questioning Mr. Dowd. The exchange takes place on pages <br /> <br />739 to 742: <br /> <br />"Senator DOWNEY. Mr. Dowd, as f understand your testimony, <br />y-ou~a[e_oLthe_opiniorL.tbi1'i' ';' h i s_treaL,,'--Q rantsio-Mexico_only_three-cla sses <br />of water; First, 1,500,000 acre-feet, the guaranteed quantity, and then <br />an additional quantity of 200,000 acre-feet that you have been testifying <br />about, and then only the right to use the wa'ter that reaches her boundaries. <br />Is that correct? <br />"Mr. DOWD. That is right. <br />"Senator DOWNEY. Is that the impression of the treaty that you <br />have gotten from your discussions with various engineers and representa- <br />tives of the State Department? <br />"Mr. DOWD. No. We have not discussed the treaty lately with <br />the State Department, bu', prior to the treaty's being finally negotiated <br />and signed we were told by a representative of the State Department <br />that Mexico was insisting on 2,000,000 acre-feet and she would be <br />shown how she could get it. <br /> <br />-42- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.