My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10867
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:34:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1962
Author
IBWC
Title
Mexican Water Treaty -Appendix E -Water Supply
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />._~ <br /> <br />~'l <br />'\ <br /> <br />upon the land is cOrlsumed in plant transpirtation and seepage. <br />The residue, which is a substantial part of the amount diverted, <br />eventua lly finds its way back into the stream. This water, which <br />will pass down the river to Mexico in any event, is supplemented <br />by floodwaters and other excess waters which are used for desilting, <br />canal sluicing, and other purposes. Engineers of the Bureau of Recla- <br />mation and the American section of the Boundary Commission estimate <br />that, when full development has been reached in the United States, <br />these return flows will be not less than 900,000 acre-feet a year, <br />and perhaps as much as 1, 125,000 acre-feet a year, thus limiting <br />the draft on what might be called firm water upstream to a quantity <br />somewhat less than 600,000 acre-feet a year, and perhaps as little <br />as 375,000 acre-feet a year. While the California witnesses have <br />testified that they believe these estimates of return flow to be too <br />high, the committee believes that greater weight should be given <br />the estimates of the Federal agencies, who have made long and care- <br />ful studies of this problem and who are considered to be disinterested <br />witnGsses. According to all the testimony, the average annual <br />virgin run-off from the Colorado River Basin is approximately 18,000,000 <br />acre-feet a year. <br />"The amount allocated to Mexico is thus only about 8 percent <br />of the total supply, and the amount of firm water--that is, water <br />which must be released from storage at Davis Dam--which will <br />ultimately be required, in addition to return flows which will be <br />in the river in any event, is only 3 percent or less, of the total <br />annual supply. The balance remaining for use in the United States, <br />or approximately 16,500,000 acre-feet on the average, will permit of <br />a tota 1 development in the United States almost treble the present <br />development. That is to say, the United States is now USing only <br />a little over a third of the water which is made available for her use <br />under-the-trea ty~-Mexi=.,-OI'l-the-other-ha oo.,-i S-110W-U sing-approxi-- <br />mately 1,800,000 acre-feet a year, and in the meantime some <br />B, 000,000 or 9,000,000 acre-feet of water flows through Mexican <br />territory and wastes unused into the Gulf of California. The testi- <br />mony is that it will be many years hence before this water can all <br />be put to beneficia! use in the United States. If and when that <br />time arrives, present Mexican uses must be curtailed. Thus, by <br />placing for all time a limit, measurably below present Mexican <br />diversions, upon the obligation of the United States to supply <br />Colorado River water to Mexico, the treaty provides needed assur- <br />ance to American agencies and communities in planning future <br />developments. " <br /> <br />And on pages 6 and 7: <br /> <br />"The committee is unqualifiedly of the opinion that the language <br />of articles 10 and 11 of the treaty is clear and subject to no other <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.